FMET ranks 2nd and ARVR 6th of 6 funds in the Metaverse & Connectivity Category.
ARVR vs FMET
FMET −0.31pt a year
0.70%0.39%
FMET 12.1×the volume
3784.56K
ARVR +8.2pt
+23.3%+15.1%
ARVR vs FMET Performance
+16.5%+4.9%
- ARVR 0.70%
- FMET 0.39%, better
- ARVR $8M
- FMET $40M
- ARVR +16.5%, better
- FMET +4.9%
- ARVR 0.64%
- FMET 0.71%, better
- ARVR 44
- FMET 63
- ARVR 378 sh
- FMET 4.56K sh, better
- ARVR $54.70
- FMET $37.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARVR | FMET |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A81Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | B67Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | F10 | C46Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B65 |
| Durability | C42 | C48Higher |
Rank among Metaverse & Connectivity funds
Same Category. ARVR and FMET are both graded against the same 6 Metaverse & Connectivity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARVRD
FMETB
In short
ARVR A literal bet on the metaverse: roughly 50 global companies tied to virtual worlds, tracked by index rather than a manager's hunch. First Trust launched it in 2022, right as the theme crested.
FMET Fidelity's in-house take on the metaverse trade: a passive, global basket of roughly 60 companies building the plumbing, priced well under the typical thematic fund. A big-brand ETF in a corner usually run by boutiques.
Stated mandate
ARVR The Fund seeks investment results that generally track the price and yield performance of the Indxx Metaverse Index, before fees and expenses.
FMET The fund seeks investment returns that generally track the Fidelity Metaverse Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARVR vs FMET Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARVR vs FMET Cost
Overpaying ARVR vs FMET
$5,708
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARVR 0.70%
$13,606
FMET 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARVR | FMET | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $705 | $545 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $2,725 | $2,035 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $7,898 | $5,708 |
- 0.70%ARVR
- 0.39%FMET, cheaper
- Middle half of Metaverse & Connectivity funds
- Median 0.64%
FMET cheapest of 6 funds
ARVR 5th cheapest of 6 funds
ARVR vs FMET Dividends
- ARVR 0.64%
- FMET 0.71%, better
- ARVR $0.37
- FMET $0.27
- ARVR $0.11
- FMET $0.11
- ARVR Jun 25, 2026
- FMET Sep 18, 2026
- ARVR Jun 30, 2026
- FMET Sep 22, 2026
- ARVR Twice a year
- FMET Quarterly
Distribution history
ARVR vs FMET Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARVR 18.9%, betterFMET 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- ARVR 1.04, betterFMET 0.65
- Worst fall
- ARVR −25.9%FMET −29.2%
- Market sensitivity
- ARVR 1.37FMET 1.46
ARVR and FMET in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
