FLCH ranks 2nd and ASHR 6th of 28 funds in the China Category.
ASHR vs FLCH
FLCH −0.46pt a year
0.65%0.19%
ASHR 33.9×the volume
3.67M108K
ASHR +0.7pt
−3.4%−4.1%
ASHR vs FLCH Performance
−16.1%−18.7%
- ASHR 0.65%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- ASHR $1.28B
- FLCH $252M
- ASHR −6.9%, better
- FLCH −20.9%
- ASHR 2.52%
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- ASHR 286
- FLCH 1112
- ASHR 3.67M sh, better
- FLCH 108K sh
- ASHR $30.09
- FLCH $19.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ASHR | FLCH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A88Higher | A87 |
| Risk | A71Higher | B64 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | B65 |
| Durability | A74Higher | A70 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. ASHR and FLCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ASHRA
FLCHA
In short
ASHR The mainland, not the offshore proxy. ASHR tracks the CSI 300, an index of the largest and most liquid stocks listed inside China's domestic A-share market, and it has been doing that job since 2013.
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
Stated mandate
ASHR The fund tracks an index representing the largest and most liquid stocks in China's A-share market.
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ASHR vs FLCH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ASHR vs FLCH Cost
Overpaying ASHR vs FLCH
$8,765
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ASHR 0.65%
$12,717
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ASHR | FLCH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $347 | $816 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $1,351 | $3,089 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $3,952 | $8,765 |
- 0.65%ASHR
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
ASHR 11th cheapest of 28 funds
ASHR vs FLCH Dividends
- ASHR 2.52%
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- ASHR $0.76
- FLCH $0.51
- ASHR $0.76
- FLCH $0.14
- ASHR Dec 19, 2025
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- ASHR Dec 29, 2025
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- ASHR Annual
- FLCH Twice a year
Distribution history
ASHR vs FLCH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ASHR
- FLCH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ASHR 19.2%, betterFLCH 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- ASHR 0.29FLCH 0.29Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- ASHR −44.1%, betterFLCH −48.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ASHR 0.64FLCH 0.55
ASHR and FLCH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





