GXC ranks 4th and ASHR 6th of 28 funds in the China Category.
ASHR vs GXC
GXC −0.06pt a year
0.65%0.59%
ASHR 156.6×the volume
3.67M23.4K
ASHR +0.7pt
+3.3%+2.6%
ASHR vs GXC Performance
−16.1%−18.2%
- ASHR 0.65%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- ASHR $1.28B
- GXC $421M
- ASHR −6.9%, better
- GXC −19.1%
- ASHR 2.52%, better
- GXC 2.46%
- ASHR 286
- GXC 1539
- ASHR 3.67M sh, better
- GXC 23.4K sh
- ASHR $30.09
- GXC $80.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ASHR | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A88Higher | A85 |
| Risk | A71Higher | B67 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | B69 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | A76 |
| Durability | A74 | A84Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. ASHR and GXC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ASHRA
GXCA
In short
ASHR The mainland, not the offshore proxy. ASHR tracks the CSI 300, an index of the largest and most liquid stocks listed inside China's domestic A-share market, and it has been doing that job since 2013.
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
Stated mandate
ASHR The fund tracks an index representing the largest and most liquid stocks in China's A-share market.
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ASHR vs GXC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ASHR vs GXC Cost
Overpaying ASHR vs GXC
$1,082
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ASHR 0.65%
$12,717
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ASHR | GXC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,058 | $105 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,051 | $389 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $11,635 | $1,082 |
- 0.65%ASHR
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
ASHR 11th cheapest of 28 funds
ASHR vs GXC Dividends
- ASHR 2.52%, better
- GXC 2.46%
- ASHR $0.76
- GXC $1.99
- ASHR $0.76
- GXC $0.67
- ASHR Dec 19, 2025
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- ASHR Dec 29, 2025
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- ASHR Annual
- GXC Twice a year
Distribution history
ASHR vs GXC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ASHR
- GXC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ASHR 19.2%, betterGXC 20.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ASHR 0.29, betterGXC 0.27
- Worst fall
- ASHR −44.1%, betterGXC −46.5%
- Market sensitivity
- ASHR 0.64GXC 0.69
ASHR and GXC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





