Skip to content

ASHR vs GXC

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF

ASHRANYSE Arca

State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

GXCANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GXC −0.06pt a year

ASHR0.65%GXC0.59%

Avg volume · 30D

ASHR 156.6×the volume

ASHR3.67MGXC23.4K

10Y return · a year

ASHR +0.7pt

ASHR+3.3%GXC+2.6%

ASHR vs GXC Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−16.1%ASHR−18.2%GXC

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. ASHR −16.1%. GXC −18.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ASHR 0.65%
GXC 0.59%, better
Fund size
ASHR $1.28B
GXC $421M
1Y total return
ASHR −6.9%, better
GXC −19.1%
Yield (12M)
ASHR 2.52%, better
GXC 2.46%
Holdings
ASHR 286
GXC 1539
Avg volume (30D)
ASHR 3.67M sh, better
GXC 23.4K sh
NAV per share
ASHR $30.09
GXC $80.17
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ASHR: Cost 53, Risk 71, Mission 88, Tradability 85, Holdings 82, Durability 74. GXC: Cost 78, Risk 67, Mission 85, Tradability 69, Holdings 76, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for ASHR, GXC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarASHRGXC
Cost30% weightC53A78Higher
Mission25% weightA88HigherA85
Risk15% weightA71HigherB67
Tradability15% weightA85HigherB69
Holdings10% weightA82HigherA76
Durability5% weightA74A84Higher

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ASHR and GXC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

GXC ranks 4th and ASHR 6th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 4AGXCState Street SPDR S&P China ETFScore 76
  5. Rank 5AKBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETFScore 74
  6. Rank 6AASHRXtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETFScore 73
  7. Rank 7ACNYAiShares MSCI China A ETFScore 70

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ASHRAXtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF

GXCAState Street SPDR S&P China ETF

In short

ASHR The mainland, not the offshore proxy. ASHR tracks the CSI 300, an index of the largest and most liquid stocks listed inside China's domestic A-share market, and it has been doing that job since 2013.

GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.

Stated mandate

ASHR The fund tracks an index representing the largest and most liquid stocks in China's A-share market.

GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.

Why people hold it

  • ASHR Roughly 300 mainland-listed companies picked for size and liquidity, so one ticker covers the heart of China's domestic market rather than its offshore listings.
  • Hugs its index closely and trades actively, which is why it rates as one of the stronger implementations among the China funds we cover.
  • The 0.65% expense ratio comes in under the 0.70% median for China single-country ETFs, unusual for a fund reaching a market most rivals do not touch directly.
  • Running since 2013 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, so the A-share access plumbing has years of live use behind it.
  • GXC Holds roughly 1,400 names across large, mid and small caps, so the portfolio reaches well past the handful of megacap internet stocks that dominate narrower China funds.ssga.com
  • Running since 2007, one of the longest-tenured US-listed China index funds, with a track record covering several full boom and bust cycles in the market.ssga.com
  • Tracks the S&P China BMI Index tightly and sits in the upper tier of its single-country China peer group on our review.

Worth knowing

  • ASHR Broad China exposure can be had for less: FLCH charges 0.19% and JCHI 0.15%, both well below ASHR's 0.65%.
  • One country, one market. There is no other geography in the basket to cushion a move in Chinese equities or a shift in Beijing's policy.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, so this is a growth-style holding rather than a steady income stream.
  • GXC The 0.59% expense ratio sits at the pricier end of the shelf. Plain index rivals such as FLCH and CXSE charge less for China exposure.
  • Volume is light next to the category's biggest China funds, so bid-ask spreads can widen. Limit orders are the usual defense.
  • One country, one policy regime: Chinese regulation, politics and currency moves drive the whole ride, and payouts land only once or twice a year.

Full ASHR profile⁠

Full GXC profile⁠

ASHR vs GXC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ASHR vs GXC Cost

Overpaying ASHR vs GXC

$1,082

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ASHR 0.65%

    $12,717

  • GXC 0.59%

    $11,635

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ASHR 0.65%
  • GXC 0.59%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530ASHR $12,717GXC $11,635

Year by year

YearASHRGXCOverpaying
10$1,163$1,058$105
20$4,440$4,051$389
30$12,717$11,635$1,082

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%ASHR
  • 0.59%GXC, cheaper
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds

ASHR 11th cheapest of 28 funds

ASHR vs GXC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ASHR 2.52%, better
GXC 2.46%
Payout (12M)
ASHR $0.76
GXC $1.99
Last payment
ASHR $0.76
GXC $0.67
Ex-dividend
ASHR Dec 19, 2025
GXC Jun 22, 2026
Paid on
ASHR Dec 29, 2025
GXC Jun 26, 2026
Frequency
ASHR Annual
GXC Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ASHRAnnual · 9 paymentsAll ASHR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2017 $0.26; Dec 7, 2018 $0.29; Dec 18, 2019 $0.29; Dec 18, 2020 $0.32; Dec 17, 2021 $0.35; Dec 16, 2022 $0.32; Dec 15, 2023 $0.59; Dec 20, 2024 $0.30; Dec 19, 2025 $0.76. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD
GXCTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll GXC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.26; Dec 15, 2017 $1.71; Jun 15, 2018 $0.56; Dec 24, 2018 $1.16; Jun 24, 2019 $0.81; Dec 23, 2019 $0.83; Jun 22, 2020 $0.56; Dec 21, 2020 $0.79; Jun 21, 2021 $0.50; Dec 20, 2021 $0.90; Jun 21, 2022 $0.76; Dec 20, 2022 $1.33; Jun 20, 2023 $0.83; Dec 18, 2023 $1.69; Jun 24, 2024 $0.63; Dec 23, 2024 $1.50; Jun 23, 2025 $1.00; Dec 22, 2025 $1.32; Jun 22, 2026 $0.67. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD

ASHR vs GXC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • ASHR
  • GXC
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: GXC −46.5% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ASHR 19.2%, betterGXC 20.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ASHR 0.29, betterGXC 0.27
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ASHR −44.1%, betterGXC −46.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ASHR 0.64GXC 0.69

ASHR and GXC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ASHRAvsCXSEA

    Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GXCAvsCXSEA

    State Street SPDR S&P China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ASHRAvsFLCHA

    Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GXCAvsFLCHA

    State Street SPDR S&P China ETF · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ASHRAvsMCHIA

    Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GXCAvsMCHIA

    State Street SPDR S&P China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.