MCHI ranks 3rd and ASHR 6th of 28 funds in the China Category.
ASHR vs MCHI
MCHI −0.06pt a year
0.65%0.59%
ASHR 1.6×the volume
3.67M2.24M
ASHR +1.0pt
+3.3%+2.3%
ASHR vs MCHI Performance
−16.1%−20.6%
- ASHR 0.65%
- MCHI 0.59%, better
- ASHR $1.28B
- MCHI $5.49B
- ASHR −6.9%, better
- MCHI −21.3%
- ASHR 2.52%, better
- MCHI 2.23%
- ASHR 286
- MCHI 581
- ASHR 3.67M sh, better
- MCHI 2.24M sh
- ASHR $30.09
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ASHR | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A88Higher | A87 |
| Risk | A71Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | A85 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A82Higher | B58 |
| Durability | A74 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. ASHR and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ASHRA
MCHIA
In short
ASHR The mainland, not the offshore proxy. ASHR tracks the CSI 300, an index of the largest and most liquid stocks listed inside China's domestic A-share market, and it has been doing that job since 2013.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
ASHR The fund tracks an index representing the largest and most liquid stocks in China's A-share market.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ASHR vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ASHR vs MCHI Cost
Overpaying ASHR vs MCHI
$1,082
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ASHR 0.65%
$12,717
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ASHR | MCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,058 | $105 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,051 | $389 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $11,635 | $1,082 |
- 0.65%ASHR
- 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
ASHR 11th cheapest of 28 funds
ASHR vs MCHI Dividends
- ASHR 2.52%, better
- MCHI 2.23%
- ASHR $0.76
- MCHI $1.10
- ASHR $0.76
- MCHI $0.36
- ASHR Dec 19, 2025
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- ASHR Dec 29, 2025
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- ASHR Annual
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
ASHR vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ASHR
- MCHI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ASHR 19.2%, betterMCHI 21.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ASHR 0.29, betterMCHI 0.26
- Worst fall
- ASHR −44.1%, betterMCHI −49.2%
- Market sensitivity
- ASHR 0.64MCHI 0.63
ASHR and MCHI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





