FLCH ranks 2nd and ASHS 10th of 28 funds in the China Category.
ASHS vs FLCH
FLCH −0.46pt a year
0.65%0.19%
FLCH 12.6×the volume
8.62K108K
ASHS +2.0pt
−2.1%−4.1%
ASHS vs FLCH Performance
−10.1%−18.7%
- ASHS 0.65%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- ASHS $24M
- FLCH $252M
- ASHS −7.5%, better
- FLCH −20.9%
- ASHS 0.00%
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- ASHS 495
- FLCH 1112
- ASHS 8.62K sh
- FLCH 108K sh, better
- ASHS $34.58
- FLCH $19.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ASHS | FLCH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A75 | A87Higher |
| Risk | B57 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | C49 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | A81Higher | B65 |
| Durability | B60 | A70Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. ASHS and FLCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ASHSB
FLCHA
In short
ASHS A pure play on the small end of mainland China: roughly 500 of the smallest, most liquid A-shares, indexed and left alone. Running since 2014 at 0.65% a year.
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
Stated mandate
ASHS The Fund passively seeks to approximate an index tracking small-cap companies in China's A-Share market, specifically the 500 smallest and most liquid stocks.
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ASHS vs FLCH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ASHS vs FLCH Cost
Overpaying ASHS vs FLCH
$8,765
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ASHS 0.65%
$12,717
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ASHS | FLCH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $347 | $816 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $1,351 | $3,089 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $3,952 | $8,765 |
- 0.65%ASHS
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
ASHS 11th cheapest of 28 funds
ASHS vs FLCH Dividends
- ASHS 0.00%
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- ASHS None
- FLCH $0.51
- ASHS
- FLCH $0.14
- ASHS
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- ASHS
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- ASHS
- FLCH Twice a year
Distribution history
ASHS vs FLCH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ASHS
- FLCH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ASHS 29.1%FLCH 21.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ASHS 0.27FLCH 0.29, better
- Worst fall
- ASHS −45.5%, betterFLCH −48.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ASHS 0.99FLCH 0.55
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.