GXC ranks 4th and ASHS 10th of 28 funds in the China Category.
ASHS vs GXC
GXC −0.06pt a year
0.65%0.59%
GXC 2.7×the volume
8.62K23.4K
GXC +2.1pt
+0.5%+2.6%
ASHS vs GXC Performance
−10.1%−18.2%
- ASHS 0.65%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- ASHS $24M
- GXC $421M
- ASHS −7.5%, better
- GXC −19.1%
- ASHS 0.00%
- GXC 2.46%, better
- ASHS 495
- GXC 1539
- ASHS 8.62K sh
- GXC 23.4K sh, better
- ASHS $34.58
- GXC $80.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ASHS | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A75 | A85Higher |
| Risk | B57 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | C49 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | A81Higher | A76 |
| Durability | B60 | A84Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. ASHS and GXC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ASHSB
GXCA
In short
ASHS A pure play on the small end of mainland China: roughly 500 of the smallest, most liquid A-shares, indexed and left alone. Running since 2014 at 0.65% a year.
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
Stated mandate
ASHS The Fund passively seeks to approximate an index tracking small-cap companies in China's A-Share market, specifically the 500 smallest and most liquid stocks.
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ASHS vs GXC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ASHS vs GXC Cost
Overpaying ASHS vs GXC
$1,082
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ASHS 0.65%
$12,717
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ASHS | GXC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,058 | $105 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,051 | $389 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $11,635 | $1,082 |
- 0.65%ASHS
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
ASHS 11th cheapest of 28 funds
ASHS vs GXC Dividends
- ASHS 0.00%
- GXC 2.46%, better
- ASHS None
- GXC $1.99
- ASHS
- GXC $0.67
- ASHS
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- ASHS
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- ASHS
- GXC Twice a year
Distribution history
ASHS vs GXC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ASHS
- GXC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ASHS 29.1%GXC 20.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ASHS 0.27GXC 0.27Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- ASHS −45.5%, betterGXC −46.5%
- Market sensitivity
- ASHS 0.99GXC 0.69
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.