Skip to content

ASHS vs GXC

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF

ASHSBNYSE Arca

State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

GXCANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GXC −0.06pt a year

ASHS0.65%GXC0.59%

Avg volume · 30D

GXC 2.7×the volume

ASHS8.62KGXC23.4K

10Y return · a year

GXC +2.1pt

ASHS+0.5%GXC+2.6%

ASHS vs GXC Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−10.1%ASHS−18.2%GXC

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. ASHS −10.1%. GXC −18.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ASHS 0.65%
GXC 0.59%, better
Fund size
ASHS $24M
GXC $421M
1Y total return
ASHS −7.5%, better
GXC −19.1%
Yield (12M)
ASHS 0.00%
GXC 2.46%, better
Holdings
ASHS 495
GXC 1539
Avg volume (30D)
ASHS 8.62K sh
GXC 23.4K sh, better
NAV per share
ASHS $34.58
GXC $80.17
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ASHS: Cost 53, Risk 57, Mission 75, Tradability 49, Holdings 81, Durability 60. GXC: Cost 78, Risk 67, Mission 85, Tradability 69, Holdings 76, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for ASHS, GXC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarASHSGXC
Cost30% weightC53A78Higher
Mission25% weightA75A85Higher
Risk15% weightB57B67Higher
Tradability15% weightC49B69Higher
Holdings10% weightA81HigherA76
Durability5% weightB60A84Higher

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ASHS and GXC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

GXC ranks 4th and ASHS 10th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 4AGXCState Street SPDR S&P China ETFScore 76
  5. Rank 5AKBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETFScore 74
  6. Rank 8BTCHIiShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETFScore 63
  7. Rank 10BASHSXtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETFScore 61
  8. Rank 10BJCHIJPMorgan Active China ETF Active China ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ASHSBXtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF

GXCAState Street SPDR S&P China ETF

In short

ASHS A pure play on the small end of mainland China: roughly 500 of the smallest, most liquid A-shares, indexed and left alone. Running since 2014 at 0.65% a year.

GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.

Stated mandate

ASHS The Fund passively seeks to approximate an index tracking small-cap companies in China's A-Share market, specifically the 500 smallest and most liquid stocks.

GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.

Why people hold it

  • ASHS Specific mandate: roughly 500 of the smallest, most liquid stocks in China's onshore A-share market, tracked by index rather than stock-picked.
  • 0.65% a year sits a shade under the middle of the China ETF pack, though broad-China alternatives run cheaper (FLCH at 0.19%, JCHI at 0.15%).
  • Live since 2014 and it stays on its stated small-cap A-share index instead of drifting. Lands in the upper half of its China peer group.
  • Spreading across about 500 names keeps any single mainland company from steering the whole portfolio.
  • GXC Holds roughly 1,400 names across large, mid and small caps, so the portfolio reaches well past the handful of megacap internet stocks that dominate narrower China funds.ssga.com
  • Running since 2007, one of the longest-tenured US-listed China index funds, with a track record covering several full boom and bust cycles in the market.ssga.com
  • Tracks the S&P China BMI Index tightly and sits in the upper tier of its single-country China peer group on our review.

Worth knowing

  • ASHS Small fund, thin trading. Spreads can widen, so limit orders and patience matter more here than with the household-name China trackers.
  • One country, one size band, no hedging. That concentration shows up as one of the rougher rides in its China cohort.
  • Not built as an income line: distributions have not been a regular feature of this fund.
  • GXC The 0.59% expense ratio sits at the pricier end of the shelf. Plain index rivals such as FLCH and CXSE charge less for China exposure.
  • Volume is light next to the category's biggest China funds, so bid-ask spreads can widen. Limit orders are the usual defense.
  • One country, one policy regime: Chinese regulation, politics and currency moves drive the whole ride, and payouts land only once or twice a year.

Full ASHS profile⁠

Full GXC profile⁠

ASHS vs GXC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ASHS vs GXC Cost

Overpaying ASHS vs GXC

$1,082

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ASHS 0.65%

    $12,717

  • GXC 0.59%

    $11,635

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ASHS 0.65%
  • GXC 0.59%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530ASHS $12,717GXC $11,635

Year by year

YearASHSGXCOverpaying
10$1,163$1,058$105
20$4,440$4,051$389
30$12,717$11,635$1,082

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%ASHS
  • 0.59%GXC, cheaper
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds

ASHS 11th cheapest of 28 funds

ASHS vs GXC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ASHS 0.00%
GXC 2.46%, better
Payout (12M)
ASHS None
GXC $1.99
Last payment
ASHS No data
GXC $0.67
Ex-dividend
ASHS No data
GXC Jun 22, 2026
Paid on
ASHS No data
GXC Jun 26, 2026
Frequency
ASHS No data
GXC Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ASHS6 paymentsAll ASHS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2019 $0.16; Dec 18, 2020 $0.15; Dec 17, 2021 $0.32; Dec 16, 2022 $0.58; Dec 15, 2023 $0.18; Dec 20, 2024 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD
GXCTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll GXC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.26; Dec 15, 2017 $1.71; Jun 15, 2018 $0.56; Dec 24, 2018 $1.16; Jun 24, 2019 $0.81; Dec 23, 2019 $0.83; Jun 22, 2020 $0.56; Dec 21, 2020 $0.79; Jun 21, 2021 $0.50; Dec 20, 2021 $0.90; Jun 21, 2022 $0.76; Dec 20, 2022 $1.33; Jun 20, 2023 $0.83; Dec 18, 2023 $1.69; Jun 24, 2024 $0.63; Dec 23, 2024 $1.50; Jun 23, 2025 $1.00; Dec 22, 2025 $1.32; Jun 22, 2026 $0.67. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD

ASHS vs GXC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • ASHS
  • GXC
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: GXC −46.5% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ASHS 29.1%GXC 20.7%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ASHS 0.27GXC 0.27Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ASHS −45.5%, betterGXC −46.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ASHS 0.99GXC 0.69

Popular comparisons

  • ASHSBvsCXSEA

    Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GXCAvsCXSEA

    State Street SPDR S&P China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ASHSBvsFLCHA

    Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GXCAvsFLCHA

    State Street SPDR S&P China ETF · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ASHSBvsMCHIA

    Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GXCAvsMCHIA

    State Street SPDR S&P China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.