MCHI ranks 3rd and ASHS 10th of 28 funds in the China Category.
ASHS vs MCHI
MCHI −0.06pt a year
0.65%0.59%
MCHI 259.5×the volume
8.62K2.24M
MCHI +1.8pt
+0.5%+2.3%
ASHS vs MCHI Performance
−10.1%−20.6%
- ASHS 0.65%
- MCHI 0.59%, better
- ASHS $24M
- MCHI $5.49B
- ASHS −7.5%, better
- MCHI −21.3%
- ASHS 0.00%
- MCHI 2.23%, better
- ASHS 495
- MCHI 581
- ASHS 8.62K sh
- MCHI 2.24M sh, better
- ASHS $34.58
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ASHS | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A75 | A87Higher |
| Risk | B57 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | C49 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A81Higher | B58 |
| Durability | B60 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. ASHS and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ASHSB
MCHIA
In short
ASHS A pure play on the small end of mainland China: roughly 500 of the smallest, most liquid A-shares, indexed and left alone. Running since 2014 at 0.65% a year.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
ASHS The Fund passively seeks to approximate an index tracking small-cap companies in China's A-Share market, specifically the 500 smallest and most liquid stocks.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ASHS vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ASHS vs MCHI Cost
Overpaying ASHS vs MCHI
$1,082
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ASHS 0.65%
$12,717
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ASHS | MCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,058 | $105 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,051 | $389 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $11,635 | $1,082 |
- 0.65%ASHS
- 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
ASHS 11th cheapest of 28 funds
ASHS vs MCHI Dividends
- ASHS 0.00%
- MCHI 2.23%, better
- ASHS None
- MCHI $1.10
- ASHS
- MCHI $0.36
- ASHS
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- ASHS
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- ASHS
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
ASHS vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ASHS
- MCHI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ASHS 29.1%MCHI 21.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ASHS 0.27, betterMCHI 0.26
- Worst fall
- ASHS −45.5%, betterMCHI −49.2%
- Market sensitivity
- ASHS 0.99MCHI 0.63
ASHS and MCHI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





