Skip to content

AUGW vs PSFJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF

AUGWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

PSFJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFJ −0.25pt a year

AUGW0.74%PSFJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

AUGW 1.9×the volume

AUGW19.8KPSFJ10.6K

3Y return · a year

PSFJ +2.9pt

AUGW+13.0%PSFJ+15.9%

AUGW vs PSFJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.0%AUGW+9.4%PSFJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUGW +8.0%. PSFJ +9.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUGW 0.74%
PSFJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
AUGW $128M
PSFJ $57M
1Y total return
AUGW +8.0%
PSFJ +9.4%, better
Holdings
AUGW 2
PSFJ 4
Avg volume (30D)
AUGW 19.8K sh, better
PSFJ 10.6K sh
NAV per share
AUGW $34.97
PSFJ $35.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUGW: Cost 37, Risk 57, Mission 100, Tradability 48, Holdings 61, Durability 41. PSFJ: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUGW, PSFJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUGWPSFJ
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightA100Not scored
Risk15% weightB57HigherD29
Tradability15% weightC48C50Higher
Holdings10% weightB61Not scored
Durability5% weightC41B57Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUGW and PSFJ are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFJ ranks 2nd and AUGW 17th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 15CNVBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETFScore 47
  6. Rank 17CAUGWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETFScore 46
  7. Rank 18CFEBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUGWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF

PSFJBPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

In short

AUGW AUGW is the August rung of a twelve-fund ladder: a year of S&P 500 exposure up to a cap, with the first 20% of losses absorbed. Built by the in-house hedging desk behind Allianz Life's annuities, priced at the going rate for deep buffers.

PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.

Stated mandate

AUGW The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust over an outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses.

PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • AUGW Deep end of the shelf: the first 20% of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over the one-year period are absorbed before fees, double the 10% tier AllianzIM sells alongside it.allianzim.com
  • The hedging is in-house. AllianzIM is Allianz Life's own investment arm and runs these funds on the proprietary platform its affiliates use for hedged assets.allianzlife.com
  • Resets each August 1 with a fresh 20% buffer and a newly struck cap, and it has monthly siblings across the calendar, so entry dates can be spread out.allianzim.com
  • Plumbing is straightforward: FLEX options written on SPY itself, and the payoff has matched the buffer-and-cap shape its own documents describe.allianzim.com
  • PSFJ Costs 0.49% a year against a 0.74% median for 20% S&P 500 buffer funds, and undercuts the 0.74% AllianzIM month-series funds (JUNW, AUGW, DECW) built on the same reference.
  • Deep cushion by design: it aims to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each roughly one-year period, before fees and expenses.paceretfs.com
  • Live since 2021, with several annual reset cycles behind it and sibling funds (PSFM, PSFD) covering other start months. One of the stronger builds in a crowded 20% buffer field.

Worth knowing

  • AUGW At 0.74% the fee sits right at the deep-buffer median, and cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PSFJ and PSFM at 0.49%, PBFR at 0.50%.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so the bid-ask spread you cross is part of what the protection costs.
  • Upside stops at the cap and the buffer is measured from the August 1 start, so mid-period buyers work with different math than the headline terms.allianzim.com
  • PSFJ The price of the cushion is a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level set when each July outcome period begins, so a roaring market leaves gains on the table.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and the cushion remaining and the room left to run differ from the stated terms.paceretfs.com
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than in the biggest names in the group. Income is not part of the design either.

Full AUGW profile⁠

Full PSFJ profile⁠

AUGW vs PSFJ Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGW vs PSFJ Cost

Overpaying AUGW vs PSFJ

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUGW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUGW 0.74%
  • PSFJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530AUGW $14,307PSFJ $9,792

Year by year

YearAUGWPSFJOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%AUGW
  • 0.49%PSFJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds

AUGW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

AUGW vs PSFJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
AUGW None
PSFJ None

Distribution history

AUGWAll AUGW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFJAll PSFJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AUGW vs PSFJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUGW 5.2%, betterPSFJ 7.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUGW 1.55, betterPSFJ 1.51
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUGW −8.8%since Aug 2023PSFJ −12.2%since Nov 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUGW 0.41PSFJ 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • AUGWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.