Skip to content

AUGW vs PSFO

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF

AUGWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

PSFOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFO −0.25pt a year

AUGW0.74%PSFO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

AUGW 2.8×the volume

AUGW19.8KPSFO7.12K

3Y return · a year

PSFO +1.5pt

AUGW+13.0%PSFO+14.5%

AUGW vs PSFO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.0%AUGW+11.5%PSFO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUGW +8.0%. PSFO +11.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUGW 0.74%
PSFO 0.49%, better
Fund size
AUGW $128M
PSFO $47M
1Y total return
AUGW +8.0%
PSFO +11.5%, better
Holdings
AUGW 2
PSFO 4
Avg volume (30D)
AUGW 19.8K sh, better
PSFO 7.12K sh
NAV per share
AUGW $34.97
PSFO $35.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUGW: Cost 37, Risk 57, Mission 100, Tradability 48, Holdings 61, Durability 41. PSFO: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission 95, Tradability 44, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUGW, PSFO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUGWPSFO
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightA100HigherA95
Risk15% weightB57HigherD29
Tradability15% weightC48HigherC44
Holdings10% weightB61Not scored
Durability5% weightC41B59Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUGW and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFO ranks 4th and AUGW 17th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 15CNVBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETFScore 47
  7. Rank 17CAUGWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETFScore 46
  8. Rank 18CFEBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUGWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF

PSFOBPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

In short

AUGW AUGW is the August rung of a twelve-fund ladder: a year of S&P 500 exposure up to a cap, with the first 20% of losses absorbed. Built by the in-house hedging desk behind Allianz Life's annuities, priced at the going rate for deep buffers.

PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.

Stated mandate

AUGW The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust over an outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses.

PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

Why people hold it

  • AUGW Deep end of the shelf: the first 20% of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over the one-year period are absorbed before fees, double the 10% tier AllianzIM sells alongside it.allianzim.com
  • The hedging is in-house. AllianzIM is Allianz Life's own investment arm and runs these funds on the proprietary platform its affiliates use for hedged assets.allianzlife.com
  • Resets each August 1 with a fresh 20% buffer and a newly struck cap, and it has monthly siblings across the calendar, so entry dates can be spread out.allianzim.com
  • Plumbing is straightforward: FLEX options written on SPY itself, and the payoff has matched the buffer-and-cap shape its own documents describe.allianzim.com
  • PSFO 0.49% a year, below the median fee in its S&P 500 buffer cohort and well under peers like PMAY (0.79%) and BUFZ (0.95%).
  • Built to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over each outcome period before the fund itself starts taking losses.
  • A 1940 Act ETF holding its own option package, not a bank-issued note, so no third-party credit sits between you and the payoff. Running since 2021.
  • Rates in the upper tier of a two-dozen-fund group of S&P 500 buffer strategies, largely on price.

Worth knowing

  • AUGW At 0.74% the fee sits right at the deep-buffer median, and cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PSFJ and PSFM at 0.49%, PBFR at 0.50%.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so the bid-ask spread you cross is part of what the protection costs.
  • Upside stops at the cap and the buffer is measured from the August 1 start, so mid-period buyers work with different math than the headline terms.allianzim.com
  • PSFO The price of the cushion: gains stop at a cap fixed at the start of each period, and the fund hasn't been an income payer.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for the full October 1 to September 30 stretch. Buy mid-period and your real cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • Small asset base and light trading, which usually means wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get entered.

Full AUGW profile⁠

Full PSFO profile⁠

AUGW vs PSFO Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGW vs PSFO Cost

Overpaying AUGW vs PSFO

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUGW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUGW 0.74%
  • PSFO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530AUGW $14,307PSFO $9,792

Year by year

YearAUGWPSFOOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%AUGW
  • 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFO cheapest of 24 funds

AUGW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

AUGW vs PSFO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
AUGW None
PSFO None

Distribution history

AUGWAll AUGW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFOAll PSFO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AUGW vs PSFO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUGW 5.2%, betterPSFO 6.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUGW 1.55, betterPSFO 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUGW −8.8%since Aug 2023PSFO −12.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUGW 0.41PSFO 0.50

Popular comparisons

  • AUGWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.