TSLS ranks 3rd and AVS 7th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AVS vs TSLS
TSLS −0.08pt a year
1.03%0.95%
AVS 28.6×the volume
11.7M410K
AVS vs TSLS Performance
−2.9%+1.0%
- AVS 1.03%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- AVS $20M
- TSLS $39M
- AVS −2.9%
- TSLS +1.0%, better
- AVS 3.07%
- TSLS 3.11%, better
- AVS 4
- TSLS 4
- AVS 11.7M sh, better
- TSLS 410K sh
- AVS $8.32
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVS | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A87 |
| Risk | A72 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B68 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AVS and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVSA
TSLSA
In short
AVS A one-ticker short on Broadcom. AVS aims for -100% of AVGO's daily move, no margin account or borrowed shares involved, at 1.03% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
AVS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Broadcom Inc.'s common shares, before fees and expenses.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVS vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVS vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying AVS vs TSLS
$1,304
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVS 1.03%
$19,173
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVS | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,814 | $1,678 | $136 |
| 20 | $6,807 | $6,322 | $485 |
| 30 | $19,173 | $17,869 | $1,304 |
- 1.03%AVS
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
AVS 18th cheapest of 43 funds
AVS vs TSLS Dividends
- AVS 3.07%
- TSLS 3.11%, better
- AVS $0.27
- TSLS $1.57
- AVS $0.04
- TSLS $0.40
- AVS Sep 22, 2026
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- AVS Sep 29, 2026
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- AVS Quarterly
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
AVS vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVS 45.2%TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVS −1.00TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- AVS −75.7%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AVS −1.48TSLS −1.41
AVS and TSLS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.03% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
