BALT ranks 1st and PSFM 5th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
BALT vs PSFM
PSFM −0.20pt a year
0.69%0.49%
BALT 2431.1×the volume
569K234
PSFM +6.7pt
+8.0%+14.7%
BALT vs PSFM Performance
+5.9%+13.9%
- BALT 0.69%
- PSFM 0.49%, better
- BALT $3.47B
- PSFM $26M
- BALT +5.9%
- PSFM +13.9%, better
- BALT 3
- PSFM 4
- BALT 569K sh, better
- PSFM 234 sh
- BALT $34.93
- PSFM $35.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BALT | PSFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | F18 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A82Higher | C50 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. BALT and PSFM are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BALTB
PSFMB
In short
BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.
PSFM A one-year hedge on the S&P 500, reset every April: PSFM buffers the first 20% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's losses and gives up gains above a cap set at each period's start. At 0.49%, it undercuts most 20%-buffer rivals.
Stated mandate
BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.
PSFM The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s return before fees and expenses, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while providing a downside-loss buffer over approximately one year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BALT vs PSFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BALT vs PSFM Cost
Overpaying BALT vs PSFM
$3,637
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BALT 0.69%
$13,429
PSFM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BALT | PSFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $883 | $349 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $3,394 | $1,303 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $9,792 | $3,637 |
- 0.69%BALT
- 0.49%PSFM, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFM cheapest of 24 funds
BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds
BALT vs PSFM Dividends
- BALT None
- PSFM None
Distribution history
BALT vs PSFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BALT 2.4%, betterPSFM 6.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BALT 1.37PSFM 1.39, better
- Worst fall
- BALT −4.9%PSFM −14.3%
- Market sensitivity
- BALT 0.18PSFM 0.51
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.