Skip to content

BALT vs PSFM

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

BALTBCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

PSFMBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFM −0.20pt a year

BALT0.69%PSFM0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

BALT 2431.1×the volume

BALT569KPSFM234

3Y return · a year

PSFM +6.7pt

BALT+8.0%PSFM+14.7%

BALT vs PSFM Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.9%BALT+13.9%PSFM

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BALT +5.9%. PSFM +13.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BALT 0.69%
PSFM 0.49%, better
Fund size
BALT $3.47B
PSFM $26M
1Y total return
BALT +5.9%
PSFM +13.9%, better
Holdings
BALT 3
PSFM 4
Avg volume (30D)
BALT 569K sh, better
PSFM 234 sh
NAV per share
BALT $34.93
PSFM $35.78
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BALT: Cost 65, Risk 65, Mission 78, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. PSFM: Cost 85, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 18, Holdings not scored, Durability 50.
Pillar letters and Scores for BALT, PSFM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBALTPSFM
Cost30% weightB65A85Higher
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherC51
Tradability15% weightB66HigherF18
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA82HigherC50

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BALT and PSFM are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

BALT ranks 1st and PSFM 5th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 6BPBJAPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - JanuaryScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BALTBInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

PSFMBPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

In short

BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.

PSFM A one-year hedge on the S&P 500, reset every April: PSFM buffers the first 20% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's losses and gives up gains above a cap set at each period's start. At 0.49%, it undercuts most 20%-buffer rivals.

Stated mandate

BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.

PSFM The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s return before fees and expenses, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while providing a downside-loss buffer over approximately one year.

Why people hold it

  • BALT Deep and short-dated: it targets a 20% buffer against losses in the S&P 500 ETF it references, over a three-month outcome period, then resets for the next quarter.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.69% a year, under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group, and it has been running the quarterly reset since launching in 2021.
  • One of the larger funds doing 20% buffers on the S&P 500, and one of the strongest implementations in that peer group.
  • PSFM Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.74% median for its 20%-buffer peer group, matching the cheapest fee in the Pacer Swan lineup and undercutting rivals like APRW and JUNW at 0.74%.
  • The 20% buffer is deep for the category: it absorbs the first fifth of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over the roughly one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.paceretfs.com
  • Top-quartile standing in its deep-buffer cohort, and April is one of several Pacer Swan start months (PSFJ runs July), so entry dates can be staggered across the calendar.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • BALT A deep buffer over a short window buys a low ceiling. The cap is set fresh each three-month period, and it is far tighter than what annual buffer funds start with.
  • The 20% cushion is measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and the buffer and cap you actually own differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PBFR at 0.50%, Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM) at 0.49%.
  • PSFM Upside is capped, and the cap is set fresh at the start of each April period, so the ceiling for a given year is not known in advance and changes from period to period.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full outcome period. Mid-period buyers get a different effective cap and remaining buffer than the headline terms.paceretfs.com
  • One of the smaller, more thinly traded funds in its category, so spreads can run wider than at the largest buffer shops, and income is not part of the design.

Full BALT profile⁠

Full PSFM profile⁠

BALT vs PSFM Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BALT vs PSFM Cost

Overpaying BALT vs PSFM

$3,637

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BALT 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PSFM 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BALT 0.69%
  • PSFM 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BALT $13,429PSFM $9,792

Year by year

YearBALTPSFMOverpaying
10$1,232$883$349
20$4,697$3,394$1,303
30$13,429$9,792$3,637

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BALT
  • 0.49%PSFM, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFM cheapest of 24 funds

BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds

BALT vs PSFM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BALT None
PSFM None

Distribution history

BALTAll BALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFMAll PSFM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BALT vs PSFM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BALT 2.4%, betterPSFM 6.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BALT 1.37PSFM 1.39, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BALT −4.9%PSFM −14.3%since Nov 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BALT 0.18PSFM 0.51

Popular comparisons

  • BALTBvsPSFDB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFMBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFJB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFMBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFOB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFMBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.