PSFD ranks 2nd and PSFM 5th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
PSFD vs PSFM
0.2%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.49%0.49%
PSFD 3.9×the volume
905234
PSFD +1.6pt
+16.3%+14.7%
PSFD vs PSFM Performance
+11.4%+13.9%
- PSFD 0.49%
- PSFM 0.49%
- PSFD $60M
- PSFM $26M
- PSFD +11.4%
- PSFM +13.9%, better
- PSFD 4
- PSFM 4
- PSFD 905 sh, better
- PSFM 234 sh
- PSFD $40.88
- PSFM $35.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSFD | PSFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85 | A85 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D30 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | C45Higher | F18 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B69Higher | C50 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. PSFD and PSFM are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSFDB
PSFMB
In short
PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.
PSFM A one-year hedge on the S&P 500, reset every April: PSFM buffers the first 20% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's losses and gives up gains above a cap set at each period's start. At 0.49%, it undercuts most 20%-buffer rivals.
Stated mandate
PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.
PSFM The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s return before fees and expenses, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while providing a downside-loss buffer over approximately one year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSFD vs PSFM Holdings
How PSFD and PSFM differ
0.2%
Shared holdings make up 0.4% of PSFM and 0.2% of PSFD.
Level by level
- Holdings0.2%
Sector
| Sector | More in PSFDMore in PSFM | PSFD | PSFM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PSFDMore in PSFM | PSFD | PSFM |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- PSFD102.6%
- PSFM107.6%
- PSFD3
- PSFM3
Asset class
- PSFD
- Equity
- PSFM
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in PSFD3
- In both0
- Only in PSFM3
Only in PSFD
3 securities, 100% of PSFD by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 7.64 C101.88%
- Spy 12/31/2026 681.92 P0.45%
- Spy 12/31/2026 409.15 P0.03%
Only in PSFM
3 securities, 100% of PSFM by weight
- Spy 03/31/2027 7.28 C106.14%
- Spy 03/31/2027 650.34 P0.90%
- Spy 03/31/2027 390.2 P0.12%
Weight gaps
PSFD and PSFM share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSFD vs PSFM Cost
Same expense ratio
$9,792
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSFD 0.49%
$9,792
PSFM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSFD | PSFM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $883 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $3,394 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $9,792 |
- 0.49%PSFD
- 0.49%PSFM
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFD cheapest of 24 funds
PSFM cheapest of 24 funds
PSFD vs PSFM Dividends
- PSFD None
- PSFM None
Distribution history
PSFD vs PSFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSFD 7.4%PSFM 6.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PSFD 1.50, betterPSFM 1.39
- Worst fall
- PSFD −14.9%PSFM −14.3%
- Market sensitivity
- PSFD 0.56PSFM 0.51
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.