Skip to content

PSFD vs PSFM

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

PSFDBCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

PSFMBCboe

Overlap

0.2%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

PSFD0.49%PSFM0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSFD 3.9×the volume

PSFD905PSFM234

3Y return · a year

PSFD +1.6pt

PSFD+16.3%PSFM+14.7%

PSFD vs PSFM Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.4%PSFD+13.9%PSFM

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PSFD +11.4%. PSFM +13.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PSFD 0.49%
PSFM 0.49%
Fund size
PSFD $60M
PSFM $26M
1Y total return
PSFD +11.4%
PSFM +13.9%, better
Holdings
PSFD 4
PSFM 4
Avg volume (30D)
PSFD 905 sh, better
PSFM 234 sh
NAV per share
PSFD $40.88
PSFM $35.78
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PSFD: Cost 85, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 69. PSFM: Cost 85, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 18, Holdings not scored, Durability 50.
Pillar letters and Scores for PSFD, PSFM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPSFDPSFM
Cost30% weightA85A85
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD30C51Higher
Tradability15% weightC45HigherF18
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB69HigherC50

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PSFD and PSFM are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFD ranks 2nd and PSFM 5th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 6BPBJAPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - JanuaryScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PSFDBPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

PSFMBPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

In short

PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.

PSFM A one-year hedge on the S&P 500, reset every April: PSFM buffers the first 20% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's losses and gives up gains above a cap set at each period's start. At 0.49%, it undercuts most 20%-buffer rivals.

Stated mandate

PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.

PSFM The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s return before fees and expenses, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while providing a downside-loss buffer over approximately one year.

Why people hold it

  • PSFD 0.49% a year versus a 0.74% median for 20%-buffer S&P 500 funds, undercutting the AllianzIM month-series lineup (JANW, APRW, JUNW). When upside is capped, fees come straight out of the ceiling.
  • Deep cushion, clean reset: FLEX options are structured to absorb the first 20% of underlying losses over the roughly one-year period, with a new cap struck at the start of each period.paceretfs.com
  • Siblings run the same recipe on other calendars (PSFM in April, PSFJ in July), so start dates can be staggered instead of pinned to one January strike. Standing sits in the upper half of the deep-buffer group.
  • PSFM Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.74% median for its 20%-buffer peer group, matching the cheapest fee in the Pacer Swan lineup and undercutting rivals like APRW and JUNW at 0.74%.
  • The 20% buffer is deep for the category: it absorbs the first fifth of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over the roughly one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.paceretfs.com
  • Top-quartile standing in its deep-buffer cohort, and April is one of several Pacer Swan start months (PSFJ runs July), so entry dates can be staggered across the calendar.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • PSFD Thinly traded. Spreads can be wider and larger orders harder to fill than in the giants of the buffer aisle.
  • No income stream: the fund holds options on an S&P 500 tracker rather than the stocks, and it has not paid a distribution.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap run start to finish of the period and are set before fees and expenses. Shares bought mid-period carry different remaining cushion and headroom.paceretfs.com
  • PSFM Upside is capped, and the cap is set fresh at the start of each April period, so the ceiling for a given year is not known in advance and changes from period to period.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full outcome period. Mid-period buyers get a different effective cap and remaining buffer than the headline terms.paceretfs.com
  • One of the smaller, more thinly traded funds in its category, so spreads can run wider than at the largest buffer shops, and income is not part of the design.

Full PSFD profile⁠

Full PSFM profile⁠

PSFD vs PSFM Holdings

As of

How PSFD and PSFM differ

Overlap by weight

0.2%

Shared holdings make up 0.4% of PSFM and 0.2% of PSFD.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in PSFD and PSFM, widest gap first
SectorMore in PSFDMore in PSFM
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in PSFD and PSFM, widest gap first
CountryMore in PSFDMore in PSFM
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • PSFD102.6%
  • PSFM107.6%

Securities held

  • PSFD3
  • PSFM3

Asset class

PSFD
Equity
PSFM
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in PSFD3
  • In both0
  • Only in PSFM3

Only in PSFD

3 securities, 100% of PSFD by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 7.64 C101.88%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 681.92 P0.45%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 409.15 P0.03%

Only in PSFM

3 securities, 100% of PSFM by weight

  • Spy 03/31/2027 7.28 C106.14%
  • Spy 03/31/2027 650.34 P0.90%
  • Spy 03/31/2027 390.2 P0.12%

Weight gaps

PSFD and PSFM share no securities.

All 7 PSFD holdings⁠All 7 PSFM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PSFD vs PSFM Cost

Same expense ratio

$9,792

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PSFD 0.49%

    $9,792

  • PSFM 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PSFD 0.49%
  • PSFM 0.49%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PSFD $9,792PSFM $9,792

Year by year

YearPSFDPSFM
10$883$883
20$3,394$3,394
30$9,792$9,792

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%PSFD
  • 0.49%PSFM
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFD cheapest of 24 funds

PSFM cheapest of 24 funds

PSFD vs PSFM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PSFD None
PSFM None

Distribution history

PSFDAll PSFD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFMAll PSFM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFD vs PSFM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PSFD 7.4%PSFM 6.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PSFD 1.50, betterPSFM 1.39
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PSFD −14.9%PSFM −14.3%since Nov 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PSFD 0.56PSFM 0.51

Popular comparisons

  • PSFDBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFMBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFMBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFMBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.