Skip to content

PSFJ vs PSFM

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

PSFJBCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

PSFMBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

PSFJ0.49%PSFM0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSFJ 45.4×the volume

PSFJ10.6KPSFM234

3Y return · a year

PSFJ +1.2pt

PSFJ+15.9%PSFM+14.7%

PSFJ vs PSFM Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.4%PSFJ+13.9%PSFM

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PSFJ +9.4%. PSFM +13.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PSFJ 0.49%
PSFM 0.49%
Fund size
PSFJ $57M
PSFM $26M
1Y total return
PSFJ +9.4%
PSFM +13.9%, better
Holdings
PSFJ 4
PSFM 4
Avg volume (30D)
PSFJ 10.6K sh, better
PSFM 234 sh
NAV per share
PSFJ $35.85
PSFM $35.78
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PSFJ: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 57. PSFM: Cost 85, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 18, Holdings not scored, Durability 50.
Pillar letters and Scores for PSFJ, PSFM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPSFJPSFM
Cost30% weightA85A85
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD29C51Higher
Tradability15% weightC50HigherF18
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB57HigherC50

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PSFJ and PSFM are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFJ ranks 2nd and PSFM 5th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 6BPBJAPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - JanuaryScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PSFJBPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

PSFMBPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

In short

PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.

PSFM A one-year hedge on the S&P 500, reset every April: PSFM buffers the first 20% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's losses and gives up gains above a cap set at each period's start. At 0.49%, it undercuts most 20%-buffer rivals.

Stated mandate

PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.

PSFM The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s return before fees and expenses, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while providing a downside-loss buffer over approximately one year.

Why people hold it

  • PSFJ Costs 0.49% a year against a 0.74% median for 20% S&P 500 buffer funds, and undercuts the 0.74% AllianzIM month-series funds (JUNW, AUGW, DECW) built on the same reference.
  • Deep cushion by design: it aims to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each roughly one-year period, before fees and expenses.paceretfs.com
  • Live since 2021, with several annual reset cycles behind it and sibling funds (PSFM, PSFD) covering other start months. One of the stronger builds in a crowded 20% buffer field.
  • PSFM Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.74% median for its 20%-buffer peer group, matching the cheapest fee in the Pacer Swan lineup and undercutting rivals like APRW and JUNW at 0.74%.
  • The 20% buffer is deep for the category: it absorbs the first fifth of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over the roughly one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.paceretfs.com
  • Top-quartile standing in its deep-buffer cohort, and April is one of several Pacer Swan start months (PSFJ runs July), so entry dates can be staggered across the calendar.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • PSFJ The price of the cushion is a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level set when each July outcome period begins, so a roaring market leaves gains on the table.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and the cushion remaining and the room left to run differ from the stated terms.paceretfs.com
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than in the biggest names in the group. Income is not part of the design either.
  • PSFM Upside is capped, and the cap is set fresh at the start of each April period, so the ceiling for a given year is not known in advance and changes from period to period.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full outcome period. Mid-period buyers get a different effective cap and remaining buffer than the headline terms.paceretfs.com
  • One of the smaller, more thinly traded funds in its category, so spreads can run wider than at the largest buffer shops, and income is not part of the design.

Full PSFJ profile⁠

Full PSFM profile⁠

PSFJ vs PSFM Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PSFJ vs PSFM Cost

Same expense ratio

$9,792

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PSFJ 0.49%

    $9,792

  • PSFM 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PSFJ 0.49%
  • PSFM 0.49%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PSFJ $9,792PSFM $9,792

Year by year

YearPSFJPSFM
10$883$883
20$3,394$3,394
30$9,792$9,792

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%PSFJ
  • 0.49%PSFM
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds

PSFM cheapest of 24 funds

PSFJ vs PSFM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PSFJ None
PSFM None

Distribution history

PSFJAll PSFJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFMAll PSFM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFJ vs PSFM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PSFJ 7.1%PSFM 6.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PSFJ 1.51, betterPSFM 1.39
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PSFJ −12.2%since Nov 2021PSFM −14.3%since Nov 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PSFJ 0.55PSFM 0.51

Popular comparisons

  • PSFJBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFMBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFMBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFMBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.