CLIP ranks 2nd and BAMU 70th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
BAMU vs CLIP
0.0%by weight
CLIP −0.93pt a year
1.00%0.07%
CLIP 34.8×the volume
8.37K291K
CLIP +1.1pt
+3.4%+4.5%
BAMU vs CLIP Performance
+2.8%+3.7%
- BAMU 1.00%
- CLIP 0.07%, better
- BAMU $66M
- CLIP $2.35B
- BAMU +2.8%
- CLIP +3.7%, better
- BAMU 2.90%
- CLIP 3.72%, better
- BAMU 7
- CLIP 27
- BAMU 8.37K sh
- CLIP 291K sh, better
- BAMU $25.30
- CLIP $100.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAMU | CLIP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D33 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | F21 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | |
| Durability | C41 | B68Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. BAMU and CLIP are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAMUD
CLIPA
In short
BAMU Most of the T-bill aisle just holds bills and charges next to nothing. BAMU goes the other way: an active manager steering maturities inside a 0 to 2 year band off its own read on the yield curve, for 1.00% a year.
CLIP Treasury bills, one to three months out, at half the fee of the category's longtime giant. Global X launched CLIP in 2023 as the cheap challenger in the parking-lot corner of the bond market, and it has hugged its index tightly since.
Stated mandate
BAMU The Fund seeks current income. It is actively managed and invests at least 80% of assets in U.S. Treasuries and investment-grade corporate bonds with maturities from 0 to 2 years, plus related fixed-income ETFs; it does not seek to replicate an index.
CLIP CLIP seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index. It invests in U.S. government Treasury bills with remaining maturities from one month to under three months.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAMU vs CLIP Holdings
How BAMU and CLIP differ
0.0%
About this figure: BAMU holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BAMU.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BAMUMore in CLIP | Gap | BAMU | CLIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- BAMU100.1%
- CLIP55.8%
- BAMU7
- CLIP27
Asset class
- BAMU
- Bonds
- CLIP
- Cash
Holdings
- Only in BAMU7
- In both0
- Only in CLIP27
Only in BAMU
7 securities, 100% of BAMU by weight
- iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF USD Class19.81%
- Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF USD Class19.77%
- iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF USD Class19.77%
- SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF USD Class19.75%
- SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF USD Class19.74%
- Bbh Sweep Vehicle1.02%
- Us Dollars0.26%
Only in CLIP
27 securities, 100% of CLIP by weight
- B 12/17/26 (BWRXMP4)7.45%
- B 12/03/26 (BW61LR4)7.07%
- B 12/24/26 (BSSBJ36)6.41%
- B 12/01/26 (BRJJ0F1)6.17%
- B 01/07/27 (BTCLH46)5.72%
- B 12/31/26 (BNVVYP5)5.09%
- B 12/10/26 (BXM7C47)4.97%
- B 01/21/27 (BV2FL73)4.85%
- B 11/10/26 (BXM1HG6)4.06%
- B 12/08/26 (BX7WM14)4.01%
- B 11/12/26 (BT9R101)3.99%
- Other Payable & Receivables3.96%
- B 12/29/26 (BV8CZK9)3.87%
- B 11/19/26 (BVSVZ28)3.83%
- B 11/17/26 (BRCDQ07)3.55%
- B 11/24/26 (C04JZH3)3.35%
- B 11/27/26 (BVPJDQ5)3.31%
- B 12/22/26 (BVSPGV6)3.24%
- B 12/15/26 (BV88875)3.09%
- B 01/26/27 (C0FRT41)2.96%
- B 01/28/27 (BXW2BR8)2.96%
- B 02/04/27 (BXL2GW9)2.53%
- B 01/14/27 (BTMT4S3)2.24%
- B 01/19/27 (C0C06G4)2.11%
- B 01/05/27 (BQZCL87)1.06%
- B 02/02/27 (C0JZ264)1.06%
- B 02/09/27 (C05DTR2)1.05%
Weight gaps
BAMU and CLIP share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAMU vs CLIP Cost
Overpaying BAMU vs CLIP
$17,208
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAMU 1.00%
$18,688
CLIP 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAMU | CLIP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $128 | $1,635 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $503 | $6,122 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $1,480 | $17,208 |
- 1.00%BAMU
- 0.07%CLIP, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
CLIP 8th cheapest of 78 funds
BAMU 78th cheapest of 78 funds
BAMU vs CLIP Dividends
- BAMU 2.90%
- CLIP 3.72%, better
- BAMU $0.73
- CLIP $3.73
- BAMU $0.17
- CLIP $0.33
- BAMU Aug 28, 2026
- CLIP Nov 2, 2026
- BAMU Sep 4, 2026
- CLIP Nov 5, 2026
- BAMU Quarterly
- CLIP Monthly
Distribution history
BAMU vs CLIP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAMU 0.3%CLIP 0.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BAMU −5.11CLIP −0.51, better
- Worst fall
- BAMU −0.4%CLIP −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BAMU −0.02CLIP 0.01
BAMU and CLIP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
