VBIL ranks 3rd and BAMU 69th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
BAMU vs VBIL
VBIL −0.94pt a year
1.00%0.06%
VBIL 363.6×the volume
8.37K3.04M
BAMU vs VBIL Performance
+2.6%+3.7%
- BAMU 1.00%
- VBIL 0.06%, better
- BAMU $66M
- VBIL $12.8B
- BAMU +2.6%
- VBIL +3.7%, better
- BAMU 2.90%
- VBIL 3.51%, better
- BAMU 7
- VBIL 29
- BAMU 8.37K sh
- VBIL 3.04M sh, better
- BAMU $25.30
- VBIL $75.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAMU | VBIL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D33 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | F22 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | C42Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A79Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. BAMU and VBIL are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAMUD
VBILA
In short
BAMU Most of the T-bill aisle just holds bills and charges next to nothing. BAMU goes the other way: an active manager steering maturities inside a 0 to 2 year band off its own read on the yield curve, for 1.00% a year.
VBIL Vanguard's cash-parking ETF: roughly two dozen Treasury bills, none maturing more than three months out, at 0.06% a year. It landed in 2025 and undercut most of the T-bill shelf on price.
Stated mandate
BAMU The Fund seeks current income. It is actively managed and invests at least 80% of assets in U.S. Treasuries and investment-grade corporate bonds with maturities from 0 to 2 years, plus related fixed-income ETFs; it does not seek to replicate an index.
VBIL VBIL seeks to track the performance of a market-weighted Treasury index with an ultra-short-term dollar-weighted average maturity, using a passive approach designed to follow the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Bills 0-3 Months Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAMU vs VBIL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAMU vs VBIL Cost
Overpaying BAMU vs VBIL
$17,418
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAMU 1.00%
$18,688
VBIL 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAMU | VBIL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $110 | $1,653 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $432 | $6,193 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $1,270 | $17,418 |
- 1.00%BAMU
- 0.06%VBIL, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
VBIL 6th cheapest of 78 funds
BAMU 78th cheapest of 78 funds
BAMU vs VBIL Dividends
- BAMU 2.90%
- VBIL 3.51%, better
- BAMU $0.73
- VBIL $2.65
- BAMU $0.17
- VBIL $0.24
- BAMU Aug 28, 2026
- VBIL Nov 2, 2026
- BAMU Sep 4, 2026
- VBIL Nov 4, 2026
- BAMU Quarterly
- VBIL Monthly
Distribution history
BAMU vs VBIL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAMU 0.3%VBIL 0.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BAMU −5.11VBIL −1.04
- Worst fall
- BAMU −0.4%VBIL −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BAMU −0.02VBIL −0.01
BAMU and VBIL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


