XHLF ranks 7th and BAMU 69th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
BAMU vs XHLF
XHLF −0.97pt a year
1.00%0.03%
XHLF 36.3×the volume
8.37K304K
XHLF +1.0pt
+3.4%+4.4%
BAMU vs XHLF Performance
+2.6%+3.6%
- BAMU 1.00%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- BAMU $66M
- XHLF $2.03B
- BAMU +2.6%
- XHLF +3.6%, better
- BAMU 2.90%
- XHLF 3.68%, better
- BAMU 7
- XHLF 29
- BAMU 8.37K sh
- XHLF 304K sh, better
- BAMU $25.30
- XHLF $50.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAMU | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D33 | C44Higher |
| Tradability | F22 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | D32Higher |
| Durability | C41 | B59Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. BAMU and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAMUD
XHLFA
In short
BAMU Most of the T-bill aisle just holds bills and charges next to nothing. BAMU goes the other way: an active manager steering maturities inside a 0 to 2 year band off its own read on the yield curve, for 1.00% a year.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
BAMU The Fund seeks current income. It is actively managed and invests at least 80% of assets in U.S. Treasuries and investment-grade corporate bonds with maturities from 0 to 2 years, plus related fixed-income ETFs; it does not seek to replicate an index.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAMU vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAMU vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying BAMU vs XHLF
$18,050
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAMU 1.00%
$18,688
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAMU | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $55 | $1,708 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $216 | $6,409 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $638 | $18,050 |
- 1.00%BAMU
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
BAMU 78th cheapest of 78 funds
BAMU vs XHLF Dividends
- BAMU 2.90%
- XHLF 3.68%, better
- BAMU $0.73
- XHLF $1.85
- BAMU $0.17
- XHLF $0.16
- BAMU Aug 28, 2026
- XHLF Nov 2, 2026
- BAMU Sep 4, 2026
- XHLF Pays Nov 5, 2026
- BAMU Quarterly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
BAMU vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAMU 0.3%XHLF 0.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- BAMU −5.11XHLF −0.50, better
- Worst fall
- BAMU −0.4%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BAMU −0.02XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.