BBCA ranks 4th and EFNL 22nd of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
BBCA vs EFNL
BBCA −0.34pt a year
0.19%0.53%
BBCA 7.5×the volume
330K43.7K
BBCA +6.6pt
+11.5%+4.9%
BBCA vs EFNL Performance
+72.5%+27.1%
- BBCA 0.19%, better
- EFNL 0.53%
- BBCA $11.9B
- EFNL $384M
- BBCA +22.1%, better
- EFNL +10.8%
- BBCA 1.68%, better
- EFNL 1.08%
- BBCA 78
- EFNL 37
- BBCA 330K sh, better
- EFNL 43.7K sh
- BBCA $104.51
- EFNL $49.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBCA | EFNL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | D30 |
| Mission | B59 | A78Higher |
| Risk | A87Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | B55Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | D34 |
| Durability | B58 | B69Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. BBCA and EFNL are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBCAA
EFNLC
In short
BBCA Canada, at a discount. BBCA tracks a Morningstar index of roughly 80 Canadian stocks for 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country funds charge, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund since its 2018 launch.
EFNL One ticker for the whole Finnish market: roughly 30 names through a capped MSCI index, run by iShares since 2012. A corner of Europe that barely registers inside broad developed-market funds.
Stated mandate
BBCA The fund seeks to track the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive indexing approach to approximate the index rather than outperform it.
EFNL The Fund seeks to follow a broad-based index of Finnish equities, providing exposure across the Finnish equity market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBCA vs EFNL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBCA vs EFNL Cost
Overpaying EFNL vs BBCA
$6,584
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBCA 0.19%
$3,952
EFNL 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBCA | EFNL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $953 | $606 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $3,658 | $2,307 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $10,536 | $6,584 |
- 0.19%BBCA, cheaper
- 0.53%EFNL
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
BBCA 7th cheapest of 38 funds
EFNL 26th cheapest of 38 funds
BBCA vs EFNL Dividends
- BBCA 1.68%, better
- EFNL 1.08%
- BBCA $1.75
- EFNL $0.54
- BBCA $0.42
- EFNL $0.29
- BBCA Sep 22, 2026
- EFNL Jun 15, 2026
- BBCA Sep 24, 2026
- EFNL Jun 18, 2026
- BBCA Quarterly
- EFNL Twice a year
Distribution history
BBCA vs EFNL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBCA
- EFNL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBCA 12.9%, betterEFNL 15.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBCA 1.55, betterEFNL 1.00
- Worst fall
- BBCA −24.4%, betterEFNL −34.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BBCA 0.88EFNL 0.88Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
BBCA and EFNL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

