FLGB ranks 3rd and EFNL 22nd of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EFNL vs FLGB
FLGB −0.44pt a year
0.53%0.09%
FLGB 2.4×the volume
43.7K106K
FLGB +6.8pt
+4.9%+11.7%
EFNL vs FLGB Performance
+27.1%+74.3%
- EFNL 0.53%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- EFNL $384M
- FLGB $878M
- EFNL +10.8%
- FLGB +15.9%, better
- EFNL 1.08%
- FLGB 2.87%, better
- EFNL 37
- FLGB 89
- EFNL 43.7K sh
- FLGB 106K sh, better
- EFNL $49.83
- FLGB $36.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFNL | FLGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D30 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A78Higher | A73 |
| Risk | C42 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | A72Higher |
| Durability | B69Higher | C53 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EFNL and FLGB are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFNLC
FLGBA
In short
EFNL One ticker for the whole Finnish market: roughly 30 names through a capped MSCI index, run by iShares since 2012. A corner of Europe that barely registers inside broad developed-market funds.
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
Stated mandate
EFNL The Fund seeks to follow a broad-based index of Finnish equities, providing exposure across the Finnish equity market.
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFNL vs FLGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFNL vs FLGB Cost
Overpaying EFNL vs FLGB
$8,638
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFNL 0.53%
$10,536
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFNL | FLGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $953 | $165 | $788 |
| 20 | $3,658 | $646 | $3,012 |
| 30 | $10,536 | $1,898 | $8,638 |
- 0.53%EFNL
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
EFNL 26th cheapest of 38 funds
EFNL vs FLGB Dividends
- EFNL 1.08%
- FLGB 2.87%, better
- EFNL $0.54
- FLGB $1.06
- EFNL $0.29
- FLGB $0.47
- EFNL Jun 15, 2026
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- EFNL Jun 18, 2026
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- EFNL Twice a year
- FLGB Twice a year
Distribution history
EFNL vs FLGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFNL
- FLGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFNL 15.8%FLGB 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EFNL 1.00FLGB 1.44, better
- Worst fall
- EFNL −34.0%FLGB −25.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EFNL 0.88FLGB 0.75
EFNL and FLGB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.53% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


