EWC ranks 1st and EFNL 22nd of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EFNL vs EWC
EWC −0.03pt a year
0.53%0.50%
EWC 38.5×the volume
43.7K1.68M
EWC +2.9pt
+8.5%+11.4%
EFNL vs EWC Performance
+27.1%+71.2%
- EFNL 0.53%
- EWC 0.50%, better
- EFNL $384M
- EWC $7.58B
- EFNL +10.8%
- EWC +21.1%, better
- EFNL 1.08%
- EWC 1.24%, better
- EFNL 37
- EWC 83
- EFNL 43.7K sh
- EWC 1.68M sh, better
- EFNL $49.83
- EWC $60.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFNL | EWC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D30 | B55Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A90Higher |
| Risk | C42 | A87Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B69 | A80Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EFNL and EWC are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFNLC
EWCA
In short
EFNL One ticker for the whole Finnish market: roughly 30 names through a capped MSCI index, run by iShares since 2012. A corner of Europe that barely registers inside broad developed-market funds.
EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.
Stated mandate
EFNL The Fund seeks to follow a broad-based index of Finnish equities, providing exposure across the Finnish equity market.
EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFNL vs EWC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFNL vs EWC Cost
Overpaying EFNL vs EWC
$557
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFNL 0.53%
$10,536
EWC 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFNL | EWC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $953 | $900 | $53 |
| 20 | $3,658 | $3,460 | $198 |
| 30 | $10,536 | $9,979 | $557 |
- 0.53%EFNL
- 0.50%EWC, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
EWC 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EFNL 26th cheapest of 38 funds
EFNL vs EWC Dividends
- EFNL 1.08%
- EWC 1.24%, better
- EFNL $0.54
- EWC $0.75
- EFNL $0.29
- EWC $0.28
- EFNL Jun 15, 2026
- EWC Jun 15, 2026
- EFNL Jun 18, 2026
- EWC Jun 18, 2026
- EFNL Twice a year
- EWC Twice a year
Distribution history
EFNL vs EWC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFNL
- EWC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFNL 15.8%EWC 13.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EFNL 1.00EWC 1.54, better
- Worst fall
- EFNL −34.0%EWC −24.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EFNL 0.88EWC 0.88Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
EFNL and EWC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.53% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





