SCHA ranks 1st and BBSC 10th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
BBSC vs SCHA
SCHA −0.06pt a year
0.09%0.03%
SCHA 239.4×the volume
12.8K3.06M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+6.2%+6.2%
BBSC vs SCHA Performance
+34.9%+35.3%
- BBSC 0.09%
- SCHA 0.03%, better
- BBSC $739M
- SCHA $22B
- BBSC +14.5%
- SCHA +18.9%, better
- BBSC 1.07%
- SCHA 1.12%, better
- BBSC 844
- SCHA 1743
- BBSC 12.8K sh
- SCHA 3.06M sh, better
- BBSC $85.93
- SCHA $33.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBSC | SCHA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A95 |
| Risk | D36 | C40Higher |
| Tradability | D28 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | A81Higher |
| Durability | D37 | A77Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. BBSC and SCHA are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBSCB
SCHAA
In short
BBSC J.P. Morgan's quiet small-cap index fund: roughly 900 names, a 0.09% fee well under the category median, and an index it follows tightly. The trade-off is thin trading volume.
SCHA Schwab's small-cap workhorse: three basis points, roughly 1,700 companies, and a mandate to hold the slice of the US market that sits below the large and mid caps. Running since 2009.
Stated mandate
BBSC The fund is designed to provide exposure to the U.S. small-cap equity market through an indexed approach. It seeks to track its underlying index by using a passive strategy.
SCHA The fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in that index’s small-cap stocks and normally places at least 90% of net assets in them.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBSC vs SCHA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBSC vs SCHA Cost
Overpaying BBSC vs SCHA
$1,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBSC 0.09%
$1,898
SCHA 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBSC | SCHA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $55 | $110 |
| 20 | $646 | $216 | $430 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $638 | $1,260 |
- 0.09%BBSC
- 0.03%SCHA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
SCHA cheapest of 16 funds
BBSC 6th cheapest of 16 funds
BBSC vs SCHA Dividends
- BBSC 1.07%
- SCHA 1.12%, better
- BBSC $0.91
- SCHA $0.37
- BBSC $0.25
- SCHA $0.10
- BBSC Sep 22, 2026
- SCHA Sep 23, 2026
- BBSC Sep 24, 2026
- SCHA Sep 28, 2026
- BBSC Quarterly
- SCHA Quarterly
Distribution history
BBSC vs SCHA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBSC
- SCHA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBSC 19.8%SCHA 18.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BBSC 0.86SCHA 0.88, better
- Worst fall
- BBSC −31.0%SCHA −30.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BBSC 1.28SCHA 1.12
BBSC and SCHA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

