Skip to content

FNDA vs SCHA

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF

FNDABNYSE Arca

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF

SCHAANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCHA −0.22pt a year

FNDA0.25%SCHA0.03%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHA 2.1×the volume

FNDA1.49MSCHA3.05M

10Y return · a year

SCHA +0.3pt

FNDA+10.2%SCHA+10.5%

FNDA vs SCHA Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+35.9%FNDA+30.4%SCHA

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. FNDA +35.9%. SCHA +30.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FNDA 0.25%
SCHA 0.03%, better
Fund size
FNDA $8.78B
SCHA $21.7B
1Y total return
FNDA +20.7%
SCHA +21.8%, better
Yield (12M)
FNDA 1.21%, better
SCHA 1.11%
Holdings
FNDA 905
SCHA 1738
Avg volume (30D)
FNDA 1.49M sh
SCHA 3.05M sh, better
NAV per share
FNDA $35.50
SCHA $32.39
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FNDA: Cost 34, Risk 60, Mission 79, Tradability 85, Holdings 68, Durability 65. SCHA: Cost 91, Risk 38, Mission 96, Tradability 86, Holdings 82, Durability 77.
Pillar letters and Scores for FNDA, SCHA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFNDASCHA
Cost30% weightD34A91Higher
Mission25% weightA79A96Higher
Risk15% weightB60HigherD38
Tradability15% weightA85A86Higher
Holdings10% weightB68A82Higher
Durability5% weightB65A77Higher

Rank among US Small-Cap funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FNDA and SCHA are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Small-Cap⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

SCHA ranks 1st and FNDA 10th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.

  1. Rank 1ASCHASchwab U.S. Small-Cap ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AVBVanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 9BBBSCJPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 10BFNDASchwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 11CEBITHarbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT)Score 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FNDABSchwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF

SCHAASchwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF

In short

FNDA Most small-cap index funds size positions by stock price. FNDA sizes them by fundamental measures of business size instead, which tilts the portfolio toward value. Schwab's contrarian take on small-cap indexing.

SCHA Schwab's small-cap workhorse: three basis points, roughly 1,700 companies, and a mandate to hold the slice of the US market that sits below the large and mid caps. Running since 2009.

Stated mandate

FNDA The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index representing small U.S. companies selected and weighted according to fundamental size measures.

SCHA The fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in that index’s small-cap stocks and normally places at least 90% of net assets in them.

Why people hold it

  • FNDA Weights companies by fundamental size measures rather than market price, so a name's slot in the fund follows the business, not the crowd's current enthusiasm for the shares.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • Roughly 900 holdings, so no single small cap steers the whole portfolio.
  • The 0.25% expense ratio sits right at the median for US small-cap ETFs, which is modest for a rules-based strategy that rebalances against price.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, running on an index built with a liquidity screen, which matters in a corner of the market where spreads bite.
  • SCHA At 0.03% a year, it is tied for the cheapest fund in its small-cap peer group and a fraction of the 0.25% category median. The fee is the one variable you know in advance.
  • Roughly 1,700 stocks, weighted by size. That is the whole small-cap tail rather than a curated shortlist, and no single name gets to steer the portfolio.
  • The contract is plain: at least 90% of net assets in the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, and it has tracked that benchmark closely.
  • Sixteen years old, multi-billion-dollar, actively traded, and pays quarterly. One of the sturdier implementations among the broad small-cap index funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • FNDA Plain market-cap rivals go far cheaper: SCHA and VB both charge 0.03%. The fundamental tilt carries a real fee premium over vanilla small-cap exposure.
  • The advertised value screen means returns can drift from standard small-cap benchmarks for long stretches, in either direction.
  • Fundamental weighting rebalances toward shares that have fallen relative to their business size, so the fund leans into unloved names by design.
  • SCHA Small caps move harder than large caps in both directions. This fund takes the full ride with no hedge, buffer, or volatility damper in the design.
  • The index sorts by size, not quality. Unprofitable and lightly covered companies come along with everything else, since no earnings screen sits in front of the portfolio.
  • It follows a Dow Jones small-cap index, not the Russell 2000 that IWM and VTWO track, so its returns and headlines about that benchmark will not line up exactly.

Full FNDA profile⁠

Full SCHA profile⁠

FNDA vs SCHA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FNDA vs SCHA Cost

Overpaying FNDA vs SCHA

$4,521

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FNDA 0.25%

    $5,159

  • SCHA 0.03%

    $638

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FNDA 0.25%
  • SCHA 0.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530FNDA $5,159SCHA $638

Year by year

YearFNDASCHAOverpaying
10$455$55$400
20$1,769$216$1,553
30$5,159$638$4,521

Expense ratio

  • 0.25%FNDA
  • 0.03%SCHA, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
  • Median 0.20%

SCHA cheapest of 16 funds

FNDA 10th cheapest of 16 funds

FNDA vs SCHA Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
FNDA 1.21%, better
SCHA 1.11%
Payout (12M)
FNDA $0.44
SCHA $0.37
Last payment
FNDA $0.13
SCHA $0.10
Ex-dividend
FNDA Sep 23, 2026
SCHA Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
FNDA Sep 28, 2026
SCHA Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
FNDA Quarterly
SCHA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FNDAQuarterly · 36 paymentsAll FNDA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 36 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 26, 2017 $0.05; Sep 18, 2017 $0.06; Dec 27, 2017 $0.0029; Mar 16, 2018 $0.03; Sep 25, 2018 $0.07; Dec 28, 2018 $0.005; Mar 20, 2019 $0.04; Jun 26, 2019 $0.07; Sep 25, 2019 $0.08; Dec 12, 2019 $0.09; Jun 24, 2020 $0.06; Sep 23, 2020 $0.07; Dec 10, 2020 $0.08; Mar 24, 2021 $0.02; Jun 23, 2021 $0.06; Sep 22, 2021 $0.07; Dec 8, 2021 $0.17; Mar 23, 2022 $0.02; Jun 22, 2022 $0.08; Sep 21, 2022 $0.09; Dec 7, 2022 $0.13; Mar 22, 2023 $0.07; Jun 21, 2023 $0.09; Sep 20, 2023 $0.09; Dec 6, 2023 $0.13; Mar 20, 2024 $0.08; Jun 26, 2024 $0.11; Sep 25, 2024 $0.11; Dec 11, 2024 $0.16; Mar 26, 2025 $0.05; Jun 25, 2025 $0.07; Sep 24, 2025 $0.11; Dec 10, 2025 $0.15; Mar 25, 2026 $0.06; Jun 24, 2026 $0.10; Sep 23, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
SCHAQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll SCHA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.04; Jun 19, 2017 $0.05; Sep 18, 2017 $0.04; Dec 18, 2017 $0.08; Mar 16, 2018 $0.05; Jun 26, 2018 $0.04; Sep 25, 2018 $0.06; Dec 12, 2018 $0.09; Dec 28, 2018 $0.0055; Mar 20, 2019 $0.04; Jun 26, 2019 $0.06; Sep 25, 2019 $0.07; Dec 12, 2019 $0.09; Mar 25, 2020 $0.06; Jun 24, 2020 $0.03; Sep 23, 2020 $0.07; Dec 10, 2020 $0.08; Mar 24, 2021 $0.05; Jun 23, 2021 $0.06; Sep 22, 2021 $0.07; Dec 8, 2021 $0.12; Mar 23, 2022 $0.03; Jun 22, 2022 $0.07; Sep 21, 2022 $0.07; Dec 7, 2022 $0.10; Mar 22, 2023 $0.07; Jun 21, 2023 $0.07; Sep 20, 2023 $0.08; Dec 6, 2023 $0.12; Mar 20, 2024 $0.05; Jun 26, 2024 $0.08; Sep 25, 2024 $0.09; Dec 11, 2024 $0.17; Mar 26, 2025 $0.06; Jun 25, 2025 $0.08; Sep 24, 2025 $0.09; Dec 10, 2025 $0.13; Mar 25, 2026 $0.04; Jun 24, 2026 $0.10; Sep 23, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD

FNDA vs SCHA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FNDA
  • SCHA
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: SCHA −30.6% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FNDA 17.6%, betterSCHA 18.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FNDA 0.77SCHA 0.88, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FNDA −25.9%, betterSCHA −30.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FNDA 1.06SCHA 1.13

FNDA and SCHA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FNDABvsVBA

    Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHAAvsVBA

    Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FNDABvsVTWOA

    Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF · Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHAAvsIWMB

    Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF · iShares Russell 2000 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FNDABvsBKSEA

    Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF · BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHAAvsVTWOA

    Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF · Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.