SCHA ranks 1st and FNDA 10th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
FNDA vs SCHA
SCHA −0.22pt a year
0.25%0.03%
SCHA 2.1×the volume
1.49M3.05M
SCHA +0.3pt
+10.2%+10.5%
FNDA vs SCHA Performance
+35.9%+30.4%
- FNDA 0.25%
- SCHA 0.03%, better
- FNDA $8.78B
- SCHA $21.7B
- FNDA +20.7%
- SCHA +21.8%, better
- FNDA 1.21%, better
- SCHA 1.11%
- FNDA 905
- SCHA 1738
- FNDA 1.49M sh
- SCHA 3.05M sh, better
- FNDA $35.50
- SCHA $32.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNDA | SCHA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D34 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A96Higher |
| Risk | B60Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A85 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | A82Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A77Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FNDA and SCHA are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNDAB
SCHAA
In short
FNDA Most small-cap index funds size positions by stock price. FNDA sizes them by fundamental measures of business size instead, which tilts the portfolio toward value. Schwab's contrarian take on small-cap indexing.
SCHA Schwab's small-cap workhorse: three basis points, roughly 1,700 companies, and a mandate to hold the slice of the US market that sits below the large and mid caps. Running since 2009.
Stated mandate
FNDA The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index representing small U.S. companies selected and weighted according to fundamental size measures.
SCHA The fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in that index’s small-cap stocks and normally places at least 90% of net assets in them.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNDA vs SCHA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNDA vs SCHA Cost
Overpaying FNDA vs SCHA
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNDA 0.25%
$5,159
SCHA 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNDA | SCHA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $55 | $400 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $216 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $638 | $4,521 |
- 0.25%FNDA
- 0.03%SCHA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
SCHA cheapest of 16 funds
FNDA 10th cheapest of 16 funds
FNDA vs SCHA Dividends
- FNDA 1.21%, better
- SCHA 1.11%
- FNDA $0.44
- SCHA $0.37
- FNDA $0.13
- SCHA $0.10
- FNDA Sep 23, 2026
- SCHA Sep 23, 2026
- FNDA Sep 28, 2026
- SCHA Sep 28, 2026
- FNDA Quarterly
- SCHA Quarterly
Distribution history
FNDA vs SCHA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNDA
- SCHA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNDA 17.6%, betterSCHA 18.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FNDA 0.77SCHA 0.88, better
- Worst fall
- FNDA −25.9%, betterSCHA −30.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FNDA 1.06SCHA 1.13
FNDA and SCHA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

