SCHA ranks 1st and IWM 6th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
IWM vs SCHA
SCHA −0.16pt a year
0.19%0.03%
IWM 7.2×the volume
21.9M3.06M
SCHA +0.3pt
+10.3%+10.6%
IWM vs SCHA Performance
+30.3%+35.3%
- IWM 0.19%
- SCHA 0.03%, better
- IWM $75.5B
- SCHA $22B
- IWM +14.6%
- SCHA +18.9%, better
- IWM 0.98%
- SCHA 1.12%, better
- IWM 1974
- SCHA 1743
- IWM 21.9M sh, better
- SCHA 3.06M sh
- IWM $279.44
- SCHA $33.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWM | SCHA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A95 |
| Risk | D34 | C40Higher |
| Tradability | A91Higher | A86 |
| Holdings | A70 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | A77 |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. IWM and SCHA are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWMB
SCHAA
In short
IWM The Russell 2000's default trading vehicle. Live since 2000, it packs the small-cap end of the US market into one heavily traded ticker with a deep options market around it. Cheaper funds track the same index; this is the liquid one.
SCHA Schwab's small-cap workhorse: three basis points, roughly 1,700 companies, and a mandate to hold the slice of the US market that sits below the large and mid caps. Running since 2009.
Stated mandate
IWM The Fund seeks to track the Russell 2000 Index, which represents small-capitalization U.S. equities.
SCHA The fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in that index’s small-cap stocks and normally places at least 90% of net assets in them.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWM vs SCHA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWM vs SCHA Cost
Overpaying IWM vs SCHA
$3,314
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWM 0.19%
$3,952
SCHA 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWM | SCHA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $55 | $292 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $216 | $1,135 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $638 | $3,314 |
- 0.19%IWM
- 0.03%SCHA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
SCHA cheapest of 16 funds
IWM 8th cheapest of 16 funds
IWM vs SCHA Dividends
- IWM 0.98%
- SCHA 1.12%, better
- IWM $2.73
- SCHA $0.37
- IWM $0.75
- SCHA $0.10
- IWM Sep 15, 2026
- SCHA Sep 23, 2026
- IWM Sep 18, 2026
- SCHA Sep 28, 2026
- IWM Quarterly
- SCHA Quarterly
Distribution history
IWM vs SCHA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IWM
- SCHA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWM 19.0%SCHA 18.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IWM 0.85SCHA 0.88, better
- Worst fall
- IWM −31.9%SCHA −30.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IWM 1.14SCHA 1.12
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





