VTWO ranks 4th and BBSC 10th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
BBSC vs VTWO
VTWO −0.03pt a year
0.09%0.06%
VTWO 113.4×the volume
12.8K1.45M
BBSC +0.6pt
+6.2%+5.6%
BBSC vs VTWO Performance
+34.9%+31.3%
- BBSC 0.09%
- VTWO 0.06%, better
- BBSC $739M
- VTWO $17.3B
- BBSC +14.5%
- VTWO +14.8%, better
- BBSC 1.07%
- VTWO 1.20%, better
- BBSC 844
- VTWO 2000
- BBSC 12.8K sh
- VTWO 1.45M sh, better
- BBSC $85.93
- VTWO $112.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBSC | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63 | A75Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D36Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | D28 | C54Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | A70Higher |
| Durability | D37 | A83Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. BBSC and VTWO are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBSCB
VTWOA
In short
BBSC J.P. Morgan's quiet small-cap index fund: roughly 900 names, a 0.09% fee well under the category median, and an index it follows tightly. The trade-off is thin trading volume.
VTWO The Russell 2000 is the small-cap benchmark every headline quotes. VTWO is Vanguard's cheap seat on it: about 2,000 small US companies for 0.06% a year, a fraction of the fee on the best-known fund tracking the same index.
Stated mandate
BBSC The fund is designed to provide exposure to the U.S. small-cap equity market through an indexed approach. It seeks to track its underlying index by using a passive strategy.
VTWO The fund invests in stocks in the Russell 2000 Index and seeks to closely track that index's return, representing small-cap U.S. stock exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBSC vs VTWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBSC vs VTWO Cost
Overpaying BBSC vs VTWO
$628
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBSC 0.09%
$1,898
VTWO 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBSC | VTWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $110 | $55 |
| 20 | $646 | $432 | $214 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $1,270 | $628 |
- 0.09%BBSC
- 0.06%VTWO, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VTWO 4th cheapest of 16 funds
BBSC 6th cheapest of 16 funds
BBSC vs VTWO Dividends
- BBSC 1.07%
- VTWO 1.20%, better
- BBSC $0.91
- VTWO $1.36
- BBSC $0.25
- VTWO $0.39
- BBSC Sep 22, 2026
- VTWO Sep 23, 2026
- BBSC Sep 24, 2026
- VTWO Sep 25, 2026
- BBSC Quarterly
- VTWO Quarterly
Distribution history
BBSC vs VTWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBSC
- VTWO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBSC 19.8%VTWO 19.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BBSC 0.86VTWO 0.86Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- BBSC −31.0%, betterVTWO −31.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BBSC 1.28VTWO 1.14
BBSC and VTWO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



