VB ranks 2nd and BBSC 10th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
BBSC vs VB
VB −0.06pt a year
0.09%0.03%
VB 39.0×the volume
12.8K499K
VB +0.2pt
+6.2%+6.4%
BBSC vs VB Performance
+34.9%+36.2%
- BBSC 0.09%
- VB 0.03%, better
- BBSC $739M
- VB $176B
- BBSC +14.5%
- VB +15.3%, better
- BBSC 1.07%
- VB 1.26%, better
- BBSC 844
- VB 1305
- BBSC 12.8K sh
- VB 499K sh, better
- BBSC $85.93
- VB $290.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBSC | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A86 |
| Risk | D36 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | D28 | B57Higher |
| Holdings | B63Higher | B59 |
| Durability | D37 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. BBSC and VB are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBSCB
VBA
In short
BBSC J.P. Morgan's quiet small-cap index fund: roughly 900 names, a 0.09% fee well under the category median, and an index it follows tightly. The trade-off is thin trading volume.
VB Vanguard's small-cap workhorse: roughly 1,400 smaller US companies for three basis points. The CRSP index behind it shifts stocks between size bands in two half steps instead of one jump, which holds turnover down. Trading since 2004.
Stated mandate
BBSC The fund is designed to provide exposure to the U.S. small-cap equity market through an indexed approach. It seeks to track its underlying index by using a passive strategy.
VB The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Small Cap Index, which measures the investment performance of small U.S. companies. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the index by holding its securities in approximately their index weights.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBSC vs VB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBSC vs VB Cost
Overpaying BBSC vs VB
$1,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBSC 0.09%
$1,898
VB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBSC | VB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $55 | $110 |
| 20 | $646 | $216 | $430 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $638 | $1,260 |
- 0.09%BBSC
- 0.03%VB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VB cheapest of 16 funds
BBSC 6th cheapest of 16 funds
BBSC vs VB Dividends
- BBSC 1.07%
- VB 1.26%, better
- BBSC $0.91
- VB $3.65
- BBSC $0.25
- VB $0.85
- BBSC Sep 22, 2026
- VB Sep 28, 2026
- BBSC Sep 24, 2026
- VB Sep 30, 2026
- BBSC Quarterly
- VB Quarterly
Distribution history
BBSC vs VB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBSC
- VB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBSC 19.8%VB 16.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BBSC 0.86VB 0.89, better
- Worst fall
- BBSC −31.0%VB −28.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BBSC 1.28VB 1.07
BBSC and VB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



