Skip to content

BDGS vs ENDW

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

BDGSBNasdaq

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

Overlap

1.9%by weight

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.65pt a year

BDGS0.87%ENDW0.22%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 3.4×the volume

BDGS5.04KENDW17.1K

BDGS vs ENDW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.1%BDGS+14.9%ENDW

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BDGS +5.1%. ENDW +14.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BDGS 0.87%
ENDW 0.22%, better
Fund size
BDGS $42M
ENDW $160M
1Y total return
BDGS +5.1%
ENDW +14.9%, better
Yield (12M)
BDGS 0.52%
ENDW 2.37%, better
Holdings
BDGS 13
ENDW 73
Avg volume (30D)
BDGS 5.04K sh
ENDW 17.1K sh, better
NAV per share
BDGS $36.59
ENDW $34.35
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BDGS: Cost 59, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 43, Durability 51. ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65.
Pillar letters and Scores for BDGS, ENDW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBDGSENDW
Cost30% weightB59A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA81
Risk15% weightA71A75Higher
Tradability15% weightC50B69Higher
Holdings10% weightC43B62Higher
Durability5% weightC51B65Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BDGS and ENDW are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and BDGS 18th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 16BTDSBETC Cabana Target Beta ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 18BBDGSBridges Capital Tactical ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 18BGMOMCambria Global Momentum ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BDGSBBridges Capital Tactical ETF

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

In short

BDGS A tactical fund that publishes its dial settings: roughly 75% index ETFs and 5% cash in risk-on mode, roughly 80% cash in risk-off mode, plus a standing sleeve of about 10 large-cap stocks. 0.87%, no waiver.

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

Stated mandate

BDGS The Fund is an actively managed, diversified ETF investing in a mix of U.S. equity index ETFs, large-capitalization stocks, and cash or cash equivalents. Its allocation and rebalancing respond to macroeconomic conditions, market breadth, and volatility.

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

Why people hold it

  • BDGS The playbook sits in the prospectus: about 75% index ETFs and 5% cash when the macro read is risk-on, about 80% cash and 20% stocks when it is not. Unusually specific.sec.gov
  • The macro call shifts less than once a year by design. Rebalancing happens inside that gear: roughly twice a month in defensive stretches, about six times a year when bullish.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • The stock sleeve is roughly 10 large-cap names held for the long haul, sold when a company drops out of its index's top 10 or the manager sees a risk to the long-term story.sec.gov
  • 0.87% with no fee waiver, near what tactical-allocation funds typically charge. Cheaper shelves exist in the group, like ENDW at 0.22%. Rates in the upper half of its peer group.
  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.

Worth knowing

  • BDGS A small fund whose shares trade lightly, so spreads can run wider than on mega-cap index ETFs and bigger orders can move the price.
  • Turnover is high by design. The prospectus notes that can mean higher transaction costs and, in taxable accounts, higher taxes.sec.gov
  • Listed in 2023, so the live record is short, and the prospectus flags that cash-heavy stretches can trail the benchmark in a rising market.etfarchitect.com
  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.

Full BDGS profile⁠

Full ENDW profile⁠

BDGS vs ENDW Holdings

How BDGS and ENDW differ

Overlap by weight

1.9%

Shared holdings make up 16.8% of BDGS and 3.8% of ENDW.

Level by level

  • Holdings7 in both1.9%
  • Sector11 Sectors59.0%
  • Countryby domicile59.8%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in BDGS and ENDW, widest gap first
SectorMore in BDGSMore in ENDW
TechnologyBDGS +29.0 points
FinancialsENDW +10.5 points
EnergyENDW +9.1 points
CommunicationBDGS +9.0 points
IndustrialsENDW +7.1 points
Real EstateENDW +7.1 points
MaterialsENDW +4.3 points
Health CareBDGS +1.8 points
UtilitiesENDW +1.8 points
Consumer DiscretionaryBDGS +1.2 points
Consumer StaplesENDW +1.0 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BDGS and ENDW, widest gap first
CountryMore in BDGSMore in ENDW
United StatesBDGS +40.2 points
South AfricaENDW +3.9 points
JapanENDW +3.8 points
United KingdomENDW +3.7 points
ChinaENDW +3.3 points
TaiwanENDW +3.0 points
CanadaENDW +2.9 points
South KoreaENDW +1.8 points
Other countries (28)ENDW +17.8 points

Outside the US: ENDW 52% developed, 48% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BDGS97.4%
  • ENDW72.8%

Securities held

  • BDGS12
  • ENDW72

Asset class

BDGS
Equity
ENDW
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BDGS5
  • In both7
  • Only in ENDW65

Only in BDGS

5 securities, 83.2% of BDGS by weight

  • United States Treasury Bill 01/19/202739.97%
  • Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF36.45%
  • Micron Technology Inc2.99%

Only in ENDW

65 securities, 96.2% of ENDW by weight

  • US 10YR NOTE (CBT)Dec2622.47%
  • Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF10.21%
  • Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF7.99%

Weight gaps

All 7 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BDGS and ENDW, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BDGSMore in ENDW
Applied Materials IncAMATBDGS +2.70 points
Advanced Micro Devices IncAMDBDGS +2.64 points
Netflix IncNFLXBDGS +2.49 points
Broadcom IncAVGOBDGS +2.34 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNBDGS +2.21 points
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031ENDW +1.83 points
Meta Platforms IncMETABDGS +1.64 points

All BDGS holdings⁠All 72 ENDW holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BDGS vs ENDW Cost

Overpaying BDGS vs ENDW

$11,978

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BDGS 0.87%

    $16,536

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BDGS 0.87%
  • ENDW 0.22%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BDGS $16,536ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearBDGSENDWOverpaying
10$1,542$401$1,141
20$5,830$1,561$4,269
30$16,536$4,558$11,978

Expense ratio

  • 0.87%BDGS
  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

BDGS 19th cheapest of 46 funds

BDGS vs ENDW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BDGS 0.52%
ENDW 2.37%, better
Payout (12M)
BDGS $0.19
ENDW $0.82
Last payment
BDGS $0.19
ENDW $0.16
Ex-dividend
BDGS Dec 23, 2025
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
BDGS Dec 24, 2025
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
BDGS Annual
ENDW Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BDGSAnnual · 3 paymentsAll BDGS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.23; Dec 30, 2024 $0.57; Dec 23, 2025 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

BDGS vs ENDW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BDGS 7.9%ENDW 9.2%since May 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BDGS 1.25ENDW 1.99since May 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BDGS −9.1%since May 2023ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BDGS 0.59ENDW 0.61

Popular comparisons

  • BDGSBvsGMODA

    Bridges Capital Tactical ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BDGSBvsPTBDA

    Bridges Capital Tactical ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BDGSBvsRISNA

    Bridges Capital Tactical ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.