PTBD ranks 3rd and BDGS 18th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
BDGS vs PTBD
PTBD −0.27pt a year
0.87%0.60%
PTBD 3.7×the volume
5.04K18.6K
BDGS +10.0pt
+14.9%+4.9%
BDGS vs PTBD Performance
+5.1%−0.1%
- BDGS 0.87%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- BDGS $42M
- PTBD $83M
- BDGS +5.1%, better
- PTBD −0.1%
- BDGS 0.52%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- BDGS 13
- PTBD 1047
- BDGS 5.04K sh
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- BDGS $36.59
- PTBD $18.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BDGS | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A83Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A71Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | C50 | C50 |
| Holdings | C43 | A90Higher |
| Durability | C51 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. BDGS and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BDGSB
PTBDA
In short
BDGS A tactical fund that publishes its dial settings: roughly 75% index ETFs and 5% cash in risk-on mode, roughly 80% cash in risk-off mode, plus a standing sleeve of about 10 large-cap stocks. 0.87%, no waiver.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
BDGS The Fund is an actively managed, diversified ETF investing in a mix of U.S. equity index ETFs, large-capitalization stocks, and cash or cash equivalents. Its allocation and rebalancing respond to macroeconomic conditions, market breadth, and volatility.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BDGS vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BDGS vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying BDGS vs PTBD
$4,719
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BDGS 0.87%
$16,536
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BDGS | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,542 | $1,076 | $466 |
| 20 | $5,830 | $4,116 | $1,714 |
| 30 | $16,536 | $11,817 | $4,719 |
- 0.87%BDGS
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
BDGS 19th cheapest of 46 funds
BDGS vs PTBD Dividends
- BDGS 0.52%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- BDGS $0.19
- PTBD $1.17
- BDGS $0.19
- PTBD $0.10
- BDGS Dec 23, 2025
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- BDGS Dec 24, 2025
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- BDGS Annual
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
BDGS vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BDGS 7.9%PTBD 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BDGS 1.25, betterPTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- BDGS −9.1%PTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BDGS 0.59PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.87% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.87% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.87% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.