Skip to content

BDGS vs PTBD

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

BDGSBNasdaq

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PTBD −0.27pt a year

BDGS0.87%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTBD 3.7×the volume

BDGS5.04KPTBD18.6K

3Y return · a year

BDGS +10.0pt

BDGS+14.9%PTBD+4.9%

BDGS vs PTBD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.1%BDGS−0.1%PTBD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BDGS +5.1%. PTBD −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%2.5%7.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BDGS 0.87%
PTBD 0.60%, better
Fund size
BDGS $42M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
BDGS +5.1%, better
PTBD −0.1%
Yield (12M)
BDGS 0.52%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Holdings
BDGS 13
PTBD 1047
Avg volume (30D)
BDGS 5.04K sh
PTBD 18.6K sh, better
NAV per share
BDGS $36.59
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BDGS: Cost 59, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 43, Durability 51. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for BDGS, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBDGSPTBD
Cost30% weightB59A83Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA71HigherB60
Tradability15% weightC50C50
Holdings10% weightC43A90Higher
Durability5% weightC51A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BDGS and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and BDGS 18th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 16BTDSBETC Cabana Target Beta ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 18BBDGSBridges Capital Tactical ETFScore 56
  7. Rank 18BGMOMCambria Global Momentum ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BDGSBBridges Capital Tactical ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

BDGS A tactical fund that publishes its dial settings: roughly 75% index ETFs and 5% cash in risk-on mode, roughly 80% cash in risk-off mode, plus a standing sleeve of about 10 large-cap stocks. 0.87%, no waiver.

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

BDGS The Fund is an actively managed, diversified ETF investing in a mix of U.S. equity index ETFs, large-capitalization stocks, and cash or cash equivalents. Its allocation and rebalancing respond to macroeconomic conditions, market breadth, and volatility.

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

  • BDGS The playbook sits in the prospectus: about 75% index ETFs and 5% cash when the macro read is risk-on, about 80% cash and 20% stocks when it is not. Unusually specific.sec.gov
  • The macro call shifts less than once a year by design. Rebalancing happens inside that gear: roughly twice a month in defensive stretches, about six times a year when bullish.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • The stock sleeve is roughly 10 large-cap names held for the long haul, sold when a company drops out of its index's top 10 or the manager sees a risk to the long-term story.sec.gov
  • 0.87% with no fee waiver, near what tactical-allocation funds typically charge. Cheaper shelves exist in the group, like ENDW at 0.22%. Rates in the upper half of its peer group.
  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • BDGS A small fund whose shares trade lightly, so spreads can run wider than on mega-cap index ETFs and bigger orders can move the price.
  • Turnover is high by design. The prospectus notes that can mean higher transaction costs and, in taxable accounts, higher taxes.sec.gov
  • Listed in 2023, so the live record is short, and the prospectus flags that cash-heavy stretches can trail the benchmark in a rising market.etfarchitect.com
  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full BDGS profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

BDGS vs PTBD Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BDGS vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying BDGS vs PTBD

$4,719

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BDGS 0.87%

    $16,536

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BDGS 0.87%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BDGS $16,536PTBD $11,817

Year by year

YearBDGSPTBDOverpaying
10$1,542$1,076$466
20$5,830$4,116$1,714
30$16,536$11,817$4,719

Expense ratio

  • 0.87%BDGS
  • 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

BDGS 19th cheapest of 46 funds

BDGS vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BDGS 0.52%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Payout (12M)
BDGS $0.19
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
BDGS $0.19
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
BDGS Dec 23, 2025
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
BDGS Dec 24, 2025
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
BDGS Annual
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BDGSAnnual · 3 paymentsAll BDGS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.23; Dec 30, 2024 $0.57; Dec 23, 2025 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

BDGS vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BDGS 7.9%PTBD 5.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BDGS 1.25, betterPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BDGS −9.1%since May 2023PTBD −24.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BDGS 0.59PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • BDGSBvsENDWA

    Bridges Capital Tactical ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BDGSBvsGMODA

    Bridges Capital Tactical ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BDGSBvsRISNA

    Bridges Capital Tactical ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.