Skip to content

BDGS vs GMOD

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

BDGSBNasdaq

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.37pt a year

BDGS0.87%GMOD0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

GMOD 2.3×the volume

BDGS5.04KGMOD11.8K

BDGS vs GMOD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.1%BDGS+11.8%GMOD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BDGS +5.1%. GMOD +11.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BDGS 0.87%
GMOD 0.50%, better
Fund size
BDGS $42M
GMOD $49M
1Y total return
BDGS +5.1%
GMOD +11.8%, better
Yield (12M)
BDGS 0.52%
GMOD No data
Holdings
BDGS 13
GMOD 20
Avg volume (30D)
BDGS 5.04K sh
GMOD 11.8K sh, better
NAV per share
BDGS $36.59
GMOD $27.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BDGS: Cost 59, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 43, Durability 51. GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for BDGS, GMOD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBDGSGMOD
Cost30% weightB59A90Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA74
Risk15% weightA71A75Higher
Tradability15% weightC50A73Higher
Holdings10% weightC43B64Higher
Durability5% weightC51HigherC49

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BDGS and GMOD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and BDGS 18th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 16BTDSBETC Cabana Target Beta ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 18BBDGSBridges Capital Tactical ETFScore 56
  6. Rank 18BGMOMCambria Global Momentum ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BDGSBBridges Capital Tactical ETF

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

In short

BDGS A tactical fund that publishes its dial settings: roughly 75% index ETFs and 5% cash in risk-on mode, roughly 80% cash in risk-off mode, plus a standing sleeve of about 10 large-cap stocks. 0.87%, no waiver.

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

Stated mandate

BDGS The Fund is an actively managed, diversified ETF investing in a mix of U.S. equity index ETFs, large-capitalization stocks, and cash or cash equivalents. Its allocation and rebalancing respond to macroeconomic conditions, market breadth, and volatility.

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

Why people hold it

  • BDGS The playbook sits in the prospectus: about 75% index ETFs and 5% cash when the macro read is risk-on, about 80% cash and 20% stocks when it is not. Unusually specific.sec.gov
  • The macro call shifts less than once a year by design. Rebalancing happens inside that gear: roughly twice a month in defensive stretches, about six times a year when bullish.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • The stock sleeve is roughly 10 large-cap names held for the long haul, sold when a company drops out of its index's top 10 or the manager sees a risk to the long-term story.sec.gov
  • 0.87% with no fee waiver, near what tactical-allocation funds typically charge. Cheaper shelves exist in the group, like ENDW at 0.22%. Rates in the upper half of its peer group.
  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.

Worth knowing

  • BDGS A small fund whose shares trade lightly, so spreads can run wider than on mega-cap index ETFs and bigger orders can move the price.
  • Turnover is high by design. The prospectus notes that can mean higher transaction costs and, in taxable accounts, higher taxes.sec.gov
  • Listed in 2023, so the live record is short, and the prospectus flags that cash-heavy stretches can trail the benchmark in a rising market.etfarchitect.com
  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.

Full BDGS profile⁠

Full GMOD profile⁠

BDGS vs GMOD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BDGS vs GMOD Cost

Overpaying BDGS vs GMOD

$6,557

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BDGS 0.87%

    $16,536

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BDGS 0.87%
  • GMOD 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BDGS $16,536GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearBDGSGMODOverpaying
10$1,542$900$642
20$5,830$3,460$2,370
30$16,536$9,979$6,557

Expense ratio

  • 0.87%BDGS
  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

BDGS 19th cheapest of 46 funds

BDGS vs GMOD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BDGS 0.52%
GMOD No data
Payout (12M)
BDGS $0.19
GMOD No data
Last payment
BDGS $0.19
GMOD $0.14
Ex-dividend
BDGS Dec 23, 2025
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
Paid on
BDGS Dec 24, 2025
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
Frequency
BDGS Annual
GMOD Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BDGSAnnual · 3 paymentsAll BDGS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.23; Dec 30, 2024 $0.57; Dec 23, 2025 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

BDGS vs GMOD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BDGS 7.9%GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BDGS 1.25GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BDGS −9.1%since May 2023GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BDGS 0.59GMOD 0.48

Popular comparisons

  • BDGSBvsENDWA

    Bridges Capital Tactical ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BDGSBvsPTBDA

    Bridges Capital Tactical ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BDGSBvsRISNA

    Bridges Capital Tactical ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.