GMOD ranks 2nd and BDGS 18th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
BDGS vs GMOD
GMOD −0.37pt a year
0.87%0.50%
GMOD 2.3×the volume
5.04K11.8K
BDGS vs GMOD Performance
+5.1%+11.8%
- BDGS 0.87%
- GMOD 0.50%, better
- BDGS $42M
- GMOD $49M
- BDGS +5.1%
- GMOD +11.8%, better
- BDGS 0.52%
- GMOD
- BDGS 13
- GMOD 20
- BDGS 5.04K sh
- GMOD 11.8K sh, better
- BDGS $36.59
- GMOD $27.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BDGS | GMOD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | A71 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | C43 | B64Higher |
| Durability | C51Higher | C49 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. BDGS and GMOD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BDGSB
GMODA
In short
BDGS A tactical fund that publishes its dial settings: roughly 75% index ETFs and 5% cash in risk-on mode, roughly 80% cash in risk-off mode, plus a standing sleeve of about 10 large-cap stocks. 0.87%, no waiver.
GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.
Stated mandate
BDGS The Fund is an actively managed, diversified ETF investing in a mix of U.S. equity index ETFs, large-capitalization stocks, and cash or cash equivalents. Its allocation and rebalancing respond to macroeconomic conditions, market breadth, and volatility.
GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BDGS vs GMOD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BDGS vs GMOD Cost
Overpaying BDGS vs GMOD
$6,557
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BDGS 0.87%
$16,536
GMOD 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BDGS | GMOD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,542 | $900 | $642 |
| 20 | $5,830 | $3,460 | $2,370 |
| 30 | $16,536 | $9,979 | $6,557 |
- 0.87%BDGS
- 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds
BDGS 19th cheapest of 46 funds
BDGS vs GMOD Dividends
- BDGS 0.52%
- GMOD
- BDGS $0.19
- GMOD
- BDGS $0.19
- GMOD $0.14
- BDGS Dec 23, 2025
- GMOD Jun 30, 2026
- BDGS Dec 24, 2025
- GMOD Jul 1, 2026
- BDGS Annual
- GMOD Twice a year
Distribution history
BDGS vs GMOD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BDGS 7.9%GMOD 8.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BDGS 1.25GMOD 0.89
- Worst fall
- BDGS −9.1%GMOD −6.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BDGS 0.59GMOD 0.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.87% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.87% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.87% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.