TBJL ranks 2nd and BGLD 8th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.
BGLD vs TBJL
TBJL −0.12pt a year
0.91%0.79%
BGLD 1.7×the volume
21.3K12.2K
BGLD +15.8pt
+11.0%−4.8%
BGLD vs TBJL Performance
+68.7%−21.8%
- BGLD 0.91%
- TBJL 0.79%, better
- BGLD $53M
- TBJL $9M
- BGLD −4.6%, better
- TBJL −6.0%
- BGLD 47.63%
- TBJL
- BGLD 3
- TBJL 3
- BGLD 21.3K sh, better
- TBJL 12.2K sh
- BGLD $15.91
- TBJL $19.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BGLD | TBJL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F12 | A75Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F21 | C40Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A84Higher | B61 |
Rank among Other Buffered funds
Same Category. BGLD and TBJL are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BGLDD
TBJLB
In short
BGLD Buffer ETFs almost always wrap stocks. BGLD wraps gold: it aims to track the SPDR Gold Trust's price up to a cap reset every quarter, while cushioning a slice of GLD's losses once the first 5% is gone.
TBJL Buffer ETFs almost always wrap the S&P 500. This one wraps long-dated Treasuries, absorbing the first 9% of a 12-month price decline in exchange for a cap that resets every July. Duration risk with guardrails.
Stated mandate
BGLD The fund seeks to match the price return of the SPDR® Gold Trust, before fees and expenses, subject to a predetermined upside cap and protection against specified losses during the target outcome period.
TBJL The fund seeks to track the price return of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), subject to a 52.27% upside cap and protection against the first 9% of losses during the stated annual outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BGLD vs TBJL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BGLD vs TBJL Cost
Overpaying BGLD vs TBJL
$2,033
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BGLD 0.91%
$17,207
TBJL 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BGLD | TBJL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,610 | $1,405 | $205 |
| 20 | $6,076 | $5,331 | $745 |
| 30 | $17,207 | $15,174 | $2,033 |
- 0.91%BGLD
- 0.79%TBJL, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Buffered funds
- Median 0.85%
TBJL cheapest of 9 funds
BGLD 8th cheapest of 9 funds
BGLD vs TBJL Dividends
- BGLD 47.63%
- TBJL
- BGLD $7.58
- TBJL None
- BGLD $7.58
- TBJL
- BGLD Dec 29, 2025
- TBJL
- BGLD Dec 31, 2025
- TBJL
- BGLD Annual
- TBJL
Distribution history
BGLD vs TBJL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BGLD
- TBJL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BGLD 10.6%TBJL 9.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BGLD 1.09, betterTBJL −0.19
- Worst fall
- BGLD −15.4%, betterTBJL −28.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BGLD 0.11TBJL 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.91% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.91% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.91% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.