ENDW ranks 1st and BITC 33rd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
BITC vs ENDW
ENDW −0.66pt a year
0.88%0.22%
ENDW 4.3×the volume
3.98K17.1K
BITC vs ENDW Performance
−4.6%+14.9%
- BITC 0.88%
- ENDW 0.22%, better
- BITC $14M
- ENDW $160M
- BITC −4.6%
- ENDW +14.9%, better
- BITC 3.26%, better
- ENDW 2.37%
- BITC 2
- ENDW 73
- BITC 3.98K sh
- ENDW 17.1K sh, better
- BITC $37.65
- ENDW $34.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BITC | ENDW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | F13 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | B62 | |
| Durability | C51 | B65Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. BITC and ENDW are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BITCC
ENDWA
In short
BITC Not a bitcoin fund, not a bond fund. BITC flips between bitcoin futures and Treasuries on a rules-based trend signal, holding one or the other rather than blending them. A momentum switch in an ordinary ETF wrapper, live since 2023.
ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.
Stated mandate
BITC The Fund seeks capital appreciation through a rules-based rotation between bitcoin futures and U.S. Treasuries based on market momentum.
ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BITC vs ENDW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BITC vs ENDW Cost
Overpaying BITC vs ENDW
$12,147
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BITC 0.88%
$16,705
ENDW 0.22%
$4,558
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BITC | ENDW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,559 | $401 | $1,158 |
| 20 | $5,891 | $1,561 | $4,330 |
| 30 | $16,705 | $4,558 | $12,147 |
- 0.88%BITC
- 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
ENDW cheapest of 46 funds
BITC 20th cheapest of 46 funds
BITC vs ENDW Dividends
- BITC 3.26%, better
- ENDW 2.37%
- BITC $1.23
- ENDW $0.82
- BITC $1.23
- ENDW $0.16
- BITC Dec 26, 2025
- ENDW Sep 28, 2026
- BITC Dec 30, 2025
- ENDW Sep 30, 2026
- BITC Annual
- ENDW Quarterly
Distribution history
BITC vs ENDW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BITC 43.7%ENDW 9.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BITC 0.61ENDW 1.99
- Worst fall
- BITC −33.2%ENDW −6.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BITC 1.53ENDW 0.61
BITC and ENDW in the news
Category Review
Tactical funds ranged from a 32.2% gain to a 12.5% loss

Popular comparisons
- 0.88% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.