PTBD ranks 3rd and BITC 34th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
BITC vs PTBD
PTBD −0.28pt a year
0.88%0.60%
PTBD 4.7×the volume
3.98K18.6K
BITC +20.9pt
+25.0%+4.1%
BITC vs PTBD Performance
−4.4%−0.2%
- BITC 0.88%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- BITC $14M
- PTBD $83M
- BITC −4.4%
- PTBD −0.2%, better
- BITC 3.26%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- BITC 2
- PTBD 1050
- BITC 3.98K sh
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- BITC $37.67
- PTBD $18.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BITC | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A83Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F13 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | A90 | |
| Durability | C51 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. BITC and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BITCC
PTBDA
In short
BITC Not a bitcoin fund, not a bond fund. BITC flips between bitcoin futures and Treasuries on a rules-based trend signal, holding one or the other rather than blending them. A momentum switch in an ordinary ETF wrapper, live since 2023.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
BITC The Fund seeks capital appreciation through a rules-based rotation between bitcoin futures and U.S. Treasuries based on market momentum.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BITC vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BITC vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying BITC vs PTBD
$4,888
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BITC 0.88%
$16,705
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BITC | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,559 | $1,076 | $483 |
| 20 | $5,891 | $4,116 | $1,775 |
| 30 | $16,705 | $11,817 | $4,888 |
- 0.88%BITC
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
BITC 20th cheapest of 46 funds
BITC vs PTBD Dividends
- BITC 3.26%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- BITC $1.23
- PTBD $1.17
- BITC $1.23
- PTBD $0.10
- BITC Dec 26, 2025
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- BITC Dec 30, 2025
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- BITC Annual
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
BITC vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BITC 43.7%PTBD 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BITC 0.61, betterPTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- BITC −33.2%PTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BITC 1.53PTBD 0.74
BITC and PTBD in the news
Category Review
Tactical funds ranged from a 32.2% gain to a 12.5% loss

Popular comparisons
- 0.88% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.