GMOD ranks 2nd and BITC 34th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
BITC vs GMOD
GMOD −0.38pt a year
0.88%0.50%
GMOD 3.0×the volume
3.98K11.8K
BITC vs GMOD Performance
−4.4%+12.1%
- BITC 0.88%
- GMOD 0.50%, better
- BITC $14M
- GMOD $51M
- BITC −4.4%
- GMOD +12.1%, better
- BITC 3.26%
- GMOD
- BITC 2
- GMOD 19
- BITC 3.98K sh
- GMOD 11.8K sh, better
- BITC $37.67
- GMOD $27.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BITC | GMOD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | F13 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | B64 | |
| Durability | C51Higher | C49 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. BITC and GMOD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BITCC
GMODA
In short
BITC Not a bitcoin fund, not a bond fund. BITC flips between bitcoin futures and Treasuries on a rules-based trend signal, holding one or the other rather than blending them. A momentum switch in an ordinary ETF wrapper, live since 2023.
GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.
Stated mandate
BITC The Fund seeks capital appreciation through a rules-based rotation between bitcoin futures and U.S. Treasuries based on market momentum.
GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BITC vs GMOD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BITC vs GMOD Cost
Overpaying BITC vs GMOD
$6,726
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BITC 0.88%
$16,705
GMOD 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BITC | GMOD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,559 | $900 | $659 |
| 20 | $5,891 | $3,460 | $2,431 |
| 30 | $16,705 | $9,979 | $6,726 |
- 0.88%BITC
- 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds
BITC 20th cheapest of 46 funds
BITC vs GMOD Dividends
- BITC 3.26%
- GMOD
- BITC $1.23
- GMOD
- BITC $1.23
- GMOD $0.14
- BITC Dec 26, 2025
- GMOD Jun 30, 2026
- BITC Dec 30, 2025
- GMOD Jul 1, 2026
- BITC Annual
- GMOD Twice a year
Distribution history
BITC vs GMOD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BITC 43.7%GMOD 8.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BITC 0.61GMOD 0.89
- Worst fall
- BITC −33.2%GMOD −6.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BITC 1.53GMOD 0.48
BITC and GMOD in the news
Category Review
Tactical funds ranged from a 32.2% gain to a 12.5% loss

Popular comparisons
- 0.88% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.