BKLC ranks 2nd and IWB 5th of 29 funds in the US Large-Cap Category.
BKLC vs IWB
BKLC −0.15pt a year
0.00%0.15%
BKLC 1.2×the volume
628K509K
BKLC +0.6pt
+11.8%+11.2%
BKLC vs IWB Performance
+74.7%+70.1%
- BKLC 0.00%, better
- IWB 0.15%
- BKLC $6.88B
- IWB $48B
- BKLC +11.2%
- IWB +11.6%, better
- BKLC
- IWB 0.92%
- BKLC 504
- IWB 1027
- BKLC 628K sh, better
- IWB 509K sh
- BKLC $48.23
- IWB $413.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKLC | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B63 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C53 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | B66 | A94Higher |
| Holdings | B61 | A73Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Large-Cap funds
Same Category. BKLC and IWB are both graded against the same 29 US Large-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKLCA
IWBA
In short
BKLC BNY launched BKLC in April 2020 as one of the first US stock ETFs with a 0.00% fee, no waiver, no expiration date. It still charges nothing to hold roughly 500 large US companies, while the typical fund in its peer group charges 0.14%.
IWB The Russell 1000 in one ticker: US large caps plus the mid-cap tier underneath them. IWB has tracked that index since 2000, making it the veteran of the group, though newer clones now chase the same benchmark for less.
Stated mandate
BKLC The fund seeks to track the performance of the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index TR.
IWB The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Index and provides broad exposure to U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKLC vs IWB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKLC vs IWB Cost
Overpaying IWB vs BKLC
$3,137
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKLC 0.00%
$0
IWB 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKLC | IWB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $0 | $274 | $274 |
| 20 | $0 | $1,071 | $1,071 |
| 30 | $0 | $3,137 | $3,137 |
- 0.00%BKLC, cheaper
- 0.15%IWB
- Middle half of US Large-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
BKLC cheapest of 29 funds
IWB 11th cheapest of 29 funds
BKLC vs IWB Dividends
- BKLC
- IWB 0.92%
- BKLC
- IWB $3.81
- BKLC $0.13
- IWB $1.01
- BKLC Oct 1, 2026
- IWB Sep 15, 2026
- BKLC Oct 6, 2026
- IWB Sep 18, 2026
- BKLC Quarterly
- IWB Quarterly
Distribution history
BKLC vs IWB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BKLC
- IWB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKLC 12.7%IWB 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BKLC 1.37IWB 1.39, better
- Worst fall
- BKLC −26.2%IWB −25.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BKLC 1.02IWB 1.01
BKLC and IWB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.00% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

