EPS ranks 3rd and IWB 5th of 29 funds in the US Large-Cap Category.
EPS vs IWB
EPS −0.07pt a year
0.08%0.15%
IWB 10.0×the volume
51K509K
IWB +0.4pt
+14.6%+15.0%
EPS vs IWB Performance
+75.9%+70.1%
- EPS 0.08%, better
- IWB 0.15%
- EPS $1.63B
- IWB $48B
- EPS +14.0%, better
- IWB +11.6%
- EPS 1.13%, better
- IWB 0.92%
- EPS 506
- IWB 1027
- EPS 51K sh
- IWB 509K sh, better
- EPS $78.98
- IWB $413.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EPS | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | B63 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B63Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | A84 | A94Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | A73Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Large-Cap funds
Same Category. EPS and IWB are both graded against the same 29 US Large-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EPSA
IWBA
In short
EPS Large-cap core with a profit filter. Roughly 500 U.S. companies, all of them earnings generators, tracked since 2007 for 0.08% a year. Same plumbing as a plain index fund, with a screen most of them skip.
IWB The Russell 1000 in one ticker: US large caps plus the mid-cap tier underneath them. IWB has tracked that index since 2000, making it the veteran of the group, though newer clones now chase the same benchmark for less.
Stated mandate
EPS The fund seeks to track earnings-generating large-cap companies in the U.S. equity market.
IWB The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Index and provides broad exposure to U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EPS vs IWB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EPS vs IWB Cost
Overpaying IWB vs EPS
$1,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EPS 0.08%
$1,689
IWB 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EPS | IWB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $274 | $127 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,071 | $496 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $3,137 | $1,448 |
- 0.08%EPS, cheaper
- 0.15%IWB
- Middle half of US Large-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
EPS 6th cheapest of 29 funds
IWB 11th cheapest of 29 funds
EPS vs IWB Dividends
- EPS 1.13%, better
- IWB 0.92%
- EPS $0.90
- IWB $3.81
- EPS $0.23
- IWB $1.01
- EPS Sep 25, 2026
- IWB Sep 15, 2026
- EPS Sep 29, 2026
- IWB Sep 18, 2026
- EPS Quarterly
- IWB Quarterly
Distribution history
EPS vs IWB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EPS
- IWB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EPS 11.8%, betterIWB 12.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- EPS 1.43, betterIWB 1.39
- Worst fall
- EPS −23.6%, betterIWB −25.2%
- Market sensitivity
- EPS 0.96IWB 1.01
EPS and IWB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
