LRGC ranks 3rd and BRIF 41st of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
BRIF vs LRGC
LRGC −0.27pt a year
0.66%0.39%
LRGC 3.2×the volume
10.6K34.1K
BRIF vs LRGC Performance
+23.3%+9.5%
- BRIF 0.66%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- BRIF $171M
- LRGC $1.37B
- BRIF +23.3%, better
- LRGC +9.5%
- BRIF 0.42%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- BRIF 51
- LRGC 72
- BRIF 10.6K sh
- LRGC 34.1K sh, better
- BRIF $37.57
- LRGC $85.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BRIF | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | A97Higher | A90 |
| Tradability | C50 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A77Higher |
| Durability | C44 | A78Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. BRIF and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BRIFC
LRGCA
In short
BRIF A biblically screened take on active US large caps: Bright Portfolios scores companies on values first, then on growth-at-a-reasonable-price fundamentals, and holds a focused slate of names instead of the whole index.
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
BRIF The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed and invests primarily in U.S. large-cap equities through a proprietary process combining quantitative screening with fundamental, qualitative, valuation, and technical analysis.
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BRIF vs LRGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BRIF vs LRGC Cost
Overpaying BRIF vs LRGC
$4,998
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BRIF 0.66%
$12,896
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BRIF | LRGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $705 | $475 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $2,725 | $1,779 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $7,898 | $4,998 |
- 0.66%BRIF
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
BRIF 68th cheapest of 90 funds
BRIF vs LRGC Dividends
- BRIF 0.42%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- BRIF $0.16
- LRGC $0.45
- BRIF $0.16
- LRGC $0.45
- BRIF Dec 9, 2025
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- BRIF Dec 10, 2025
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- BRIF Twice a year
- LRGC Annual
Distribution history
BRIF vs LRGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BRIF 18.8%LRGC 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BRIF 1.08LRGC 1.26
- Worst fall
- BRIF −17.2%LRGC −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BRIF 0.91LRGC 1.00
BRIF and LRGC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
