IBMQ ranks 2nd and BSMZ 19th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMZ vs IBMQ
IBMQ −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMQ 4.8×the volume
26.5K129K
BSMZ vs IBMQ Performance
−0.6%+2.2%
- BSMZ 0.18%
- IBMQ 0.10%, better
- BSMZ $71M
- IBMQ $691M
- BSMZ −0.6%
- IBMQ +2.2%, better
- BSMZ 3.46%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMZ 1848
- IBMQ 2957
- BSMZ 26.5K sh
- IBMQ 129K sh, better
- BSMZ $24.40
- IBMQ $25.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMZ | IBMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D39 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | C41 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | A94Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A95Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMZ and IBMQ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMZC
IBMQA
In short
BSMZ A single rung of a municipal bond ladder, wrapped in an ETF. It holds roughly 1,400 munis, then terminates around Dec. 15, 2035, giving you a bond's end date without picking the bonds yourself.
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
BSMZ The fund seeks exposure to US dollar-denominated municipal securities from U.S. states, state agencies, and local issuers, targeting bonds maturing in 2035 and terminating around Dec. 15, 2035.
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMZ vs IBMQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMZ vs IBMQ Cost
Overpaying BSMZ vs IBMQ
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMZ 0.18%
$3,749
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMZ | IBMQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMZ
- 0.10%IBMQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
BSMZ 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMZ vs IBMQ Dividends
- BSMZ 3.46%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMZ $0.85
- IBMQ $0.63
- BSMZ $0.07
- IBMQ $0.06
- BSMZ Oct 19, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 1, 2026
- BSMZ Oct 23, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 6, 2026
- BSMZ Monthly
- IBMQ Monthly
Distribution history
BSMZ vs IBMQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMZ 7.8%IBMQ 3.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMZ −0.33IBMQ −0.14
- Worst fall
- BSMZ −8.5%IBMQ −10.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BSMZ 0.19IBMQ 0.54
BSMZ and IBMQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

