IBMP ranks 1st and BSMZ 19th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMZ vs IBMP
IBMP −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMP 3.9×the volume
26.5K105K
BSMZ vs IBMP Performance
−0.6%+2.4%
- BSMZ 0.18%
- IBMP 0.10%, better
- BSMZ $71M
- IBMP $685M
- BSMZ −0.6%
- IBMP +2.4%, better
- BSMZ 3.46%, better
- IBMP 2.53%
- BSMZ 1848
- IBMP 1859
- BSMZ 26.5K sh
- IBMP 105K sh, better
- BSMZ $24.40
- IBMP $25.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMZ | IBMP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D39 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C41 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | A96Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A94Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMZ and IBMP are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMZC
IBMPA
In short
BSMZ A single rung of a municipal bond ladder, wrapped in an ETF. It holds roughly 1,400 munis, then terminates around Dec. 15, 2035, giving you a bond's end date without picking the bonds yourself.
IBMP A single rung of a muni ladder in one ticker: investment-grade bonds that all mature in 2027, tax-exempt income paid monthly along the way, and a defined end date instead of a fund that rolls on forever.
Stated mandate
BSMZ The fund seeks exposure to US dollar-denominated municipal securities from U.S. states, state agencies, and local issuers, targeting bonds maturing in 2035 and terminating around Dec. 15, 2035.
IBMP The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2027. It is designed to provide tax-exempt income, support bond-ladder construction, and manage interest-rate risk through a defined maturity.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMZ vs IBMP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMZ vs IBMP Cost
Overpaying BSMZ vs IBMP
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMZ 0.18%
$3,749
IBMP 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMZ | IBMP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMZ
- 0.10%IBMP, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMP cheapest of 32 funds
BSMZ 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMZ vs IBMP Dividends
- BSMZ 3.46%, better
- IBMP 2.53%
- BSMZ $0.85
- IBMP $0.64
- BSMZ $0.07
- IBMP $0.06
- BSMZ Oct 19, 2026
- IBMP Oct 1, 2026
- BSMZ Oct 23, 2026
- IBMP Oct 6, 2026
- BSMZ Monthly
- IBMP Monthly
Distribution history
BSMZ vs IBMP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMZ 7.8%IBMP 2.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMZ −0.33IBMP −0.33Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- BSMZ −8.5%IBMP −9.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BSMZ 0.19IBMP 0.40
BSMZ and IBMP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

