Skip to content

BSMZ vs IBMR

Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF

BSMZCNasdaq

iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF

IBMRACboe

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

IBMR −0.08pt a year

BSMZ0.18%IBMR0.10%

Avg volume · 30D

IBMR 4.0×the volume

BSMZ26.5KIBMR105K

BSMZ vs IBMR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.6%BSMZ+1.6%IBMR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BSMZ −0.6%. IBMR +1.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−6%−4%−2%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BSMZ 0.18%
IBMR 0.10%, better
Fund size
BSMZ $71M
IBMR $527M
1Y total return
BSMZ −0.6%
IBMR +1.6%, better
Yield (12M)
BSMZ 3.46%, better
IBMR 2.54%
Holdings
BSMZ 1848
IBMR 2071
Avg volume (30D)
BSMZ 26.5K sh
IBMR 105K sh, better
NAV per share
BSMZ $24.40
IBMR $25.16
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BSMZ: Cost 45, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 68, Durability 41. IBMR: Cost 87, Risk 54, Mission 96, Tradability 83, Holdings 89, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for BSMZ, IBMR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBSMZIBMR
Cost30% weightC45A87Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA96
Risk15% weightD39C54Higher
Tradability15% weightC41A83Higher
Holdings10% weightB68A89Higher
Durability5% weightC41A85Higher

Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BSMZ and IBMR are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Defined-Maturity Municipal⁠

Category · 32 funds
See all 32 ›

IBMR ranks 3rd and BSMZ 19th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.

  1. Rank 1AIBMPiShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETFScore 88
  2. Rank 2AIBMQiShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETFScore 87
  3. Rank 3AIBMRiShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETFScore 83
  4. Rank 4AIBMOiShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETFScore 82
  5. Rank 18CBSMWInvesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 19CBSMZInvesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETFScore 45
  7. Rank 20CBSSXInvesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BSMZCInvesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF

IBMRAiShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF

In short

BSMZ A single rung of a municipal bond ladder, wrapped in an ETF. It holds roughly 1,400 munis, then terminates around Dec. 15, 2035, giving you a bond's end date without picking the bonds yourself.

IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.

Stated mandate

BSMZ The fund seeks exposure to US dollar-denominated municipal securities from U.S. states, state agencies, and local issuers, targeting bonds maturing in 2035 and terminating around Dec. 15, 2035.

IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.

Why people hold it

  • BSMZ Defined maturity: it targets bonds maturing in 2035 and terminates around Dec. 15, 2035. An end date, not an evergreen fund that rolls on forever.invesco.com
  • Roughly 1,400 positions from US states, state agencies and local issuers, so no single borrower carries the portfolio. The holdings are the strongest part of the package.
  • Invesco has run the BulletShares playbook for years, and its corporate rungs (BSCT, BSCU) sit among the best-executed funds in the target-maturity group.
  • IBMR Charges 0.10% a year, right at the median for target-maturity bond funds, and the iBonds lineup is built so maturity years stack into a ladder.
  • Spreads across more than a thousand investment-grade munis, so one issuer's trouble barely moves the fund.
  • Follows an AMT-free index, screening out bonds whose income can trip the alternative minimum tax.
  • Pays monthly, matching how muni income is usually spent, and holds a well-built portfolio for its category.

Worth knowing

  • BSMZ At 0.18% a year, it runs above the typical target-maturity bond fund. Fee drag bites harder when the underlying yields are muni-sized.
  • Launched in 2025 and thinly traded so far. Thin volume tends to mean wider spreads, which is what limit orders are for.
  • Distributions land on an irregular schedule rather than a fixed monthly rhythm, so the income stream needs more watching than a clockwork payer.
  • IBMR Munis are the tax-advantaged lane. For the same 2029 rung in taxable bonds, iShares also runs IBDU (corporate) and IBTJ (Treasury).
  • The index is callable-adjusted: plenty of munis can be redeemed early by their issuers, so the mix heading into the term date can shift.
  • It is a fund, not a single bond. Shares trade at market prices and move with rates along the way, and the end payout is whatever the bonds deliver.

Full BSMZ profile⁠

Full IBMR profile⁠

BSMZ vs IBMR Holdings

How BSMZ and IBMR differ

No overlap figure

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.

Level by level

  • Asset classFixed Income100%
  • Countryby domicile99.9%

Sector

No Sector split for BSMZ.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BSMZ and IBMR, widest gap first
CountryMore in BSMZMore in IBMR
United StatesIBMR +0.1 points
GuamBSMZ +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BSMZ5.0%
  • IBMR4.8%

Securities held

  • BSMZ1,605
  • IBMR1,324

Asset class

BSMZ
Fixed Income
IBMR
Fixed Income

Holdings

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. BSMZ holds 1,605 securities, IBMR 1,324.

All 1,846 BSMZ holdings⁠All 2,069 IBMR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BSMZ vs IBMR Cost

Overpaying BSMZ vs IBMR

$1,643

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BSMZ 0.18%

    $3,749

  • IBMR 0.10%

    $2,106

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BSMZ 0.18%
  • IBMR 0.10%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K051015202530BSMZ $3,749IBMR $2,106

Year by year

YearBSMZIBMROverpaying
10$328$183$145
20$1,281$717$564
30$3,749$2,106$1,643

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%BSMZ
  • 0.10%IBMR, cheaper
  • Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
  • Median 0.18%

IBMR cheapest of 32 funds

BSMZ 10th cheapest of 32 funds

BSMZ vs IBMR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BSMZ 3.46%, better
IBMR 2.54%
Payout (12M)
BSMZ $0.85
IBMR $0.64
Last payment
BSMZ $0.07
IBMR $0.05
Ex-dividend
BSMZ Oct 19, 2026
IBMR Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
BSMZ Oct 23, 2026
IBMR Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
BSMZ Monthly
IBMR Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BSMZMonthly · 13 paymentsAll BSMZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 13 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Oct 20, 2025 $0.07; Nov 24, 2025 $0.07; Dec 22, 2025 $0.03; Jan 20, 2026 $0.05; Feb 23, 2026 $0.07; Mar 23, 2026 $0.07; Apr 20, 2026 $0.08; May 18, 2026 $0.08; Jun 22, 2026 $0.08; Jul 20, 2026 $0.09; Aug 24, 2026 $0.08; Sep 21, 2026 $0.07; Oct 19, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD
IBMRMonthly · 40 paymentsAll IBMR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jul 3, 2023 $0.06; Aug 1, 2023 $0.04; Sep 1, 2023 $0.05; Oct 2, 2023 $0.05; Nov 1, 2023 $0.05; Dec 1, 2023 $0.04; Dec 14, 2023 $0.04; Feb 1, 2024 $0.06; Mar 1, 2024 $0.06; Apr 1, 2024 $0.04; May 1, 2024 $0.06; Jun 3, 2024 $0.06; Jul 1, 2024 $0.05; Aug 1, 2024 $0.05; Sep 3, 2024 $0.05; Oct 1, 2024 $0.05; Nov 1, 2024 $0.05; Dec 2, 2024 $0.05; Dec 18, 2024 $0.05; Feb 3, 2025 $0.05; Mar 3, 2025 $0.06; Apr 1, 2025 $0.05; May 1, 2025 $0.05; Jun 2, 2025 $0.05; Jul 1, 2025 $0.06; Aug 1, 2025 $0.06; Sep 2, 2025 $0.05; Oct 1, 2025 $0.06; Nov 3, 2025 $0.05; Dec 1, 2025 $0.05; Dec 19, 2025 $0.05; Feb 2, 2026 $0.05; Mar 2, 2026 $0.06; Apr 1, 2026 $0.05; May 1, 2026 $0.05; Jun 1, 2026 $0.05; Jul 1, 2026 $0.05; Aug 3, 2026 $0.05; Sep 1, 2026 $0.05; Oct 1, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD

BSMZ vs IBMR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BSMZ 7.8%since Oct 2025IBMR 4.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BSMZ −0.33since Oct 2025IBMR 0.02
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BSMZ −8.5%since Sep 2025IBMR −4.8%since May 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BSMZ 0.19IBMR 0.75

BSMZ and IBMR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BSMZCvsIBMPA

    Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF · iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBMRAvsIBMPA

    iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF · iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSMZCvsIBMQA

    Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF · iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBMRAvsIBMQA

    iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF · iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSMZCvsIBMOA

    Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF · iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBMRAvsIBMOA

    iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF · iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.