IBMR ranks 3rd and BSMZ 19th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMZ vs IBMR
IBMR −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMR 4.0×the volume
26.5K105K
BSMZ vs IBMR Performance
−0.6%+1.6%
- BSMZ 0.18%
- IBMR 0.10%, better
- BSMZ $71M
- IBMR $527M
- BSMZ −0.6%
- IBMR +1.6%, better
- BSMZ 3.46%, better
- IBMR 2.54%
- BSMZ 1848
- IBMR 2071
- BSMZ 26.5K sh
- IBMR 105K sh, better
- BSMZ $24.40
- IBMR $25.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMZ | IBMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | D39 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | C41 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | A89Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A85Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMZ and IBMR are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMZC
IBMRA
In short
BSMZ A single rung of a municipal bond ladder, wrapped in an ETF. It holds roughly 1,400 munis, then terminates around Dec. 15, 2035, giving you a bond's end date without picking the bonds yourself.
IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.
Stated mandate
BSMZ The fund seeks exposure to US dollar-denominated municipal securities from U.S. states, state agencies, and local issuers, targeting bonds maturing in 2035 and terminating around Dec. 15, 2035.
IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMZ vs IBMR Holdings
How BSMZ and IBMR differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for BSMZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BSMZMore in IBMR | BSMZ | IBMR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | IBMR +0.1 points | 99.9% | 100.0% |
| Guam | BSMZ +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- BSMZ5.0%
- IBMR4.8%
- BSMZ1,605
- IBMR1,324
Asset class
- BSMZ
- Fixed Income
- IBMR
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. BSMZ holds 1,605 securities, IBMR 1,324.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMZ vs IBMR Cost
Overpaying BSMZ vs IBMR
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMZ 0.18%
$3,749
IBMR 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMZ | IBMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMZ
- 0.10%IBMR, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMR cheapest of 32 funds
BSMZ 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMZ vs IBMR Dividends
- BSMZ 3.46%, better
- IBMR 2.54%
- BSMZ $0.85
- IBMR $0.64
- BSMZ $0.07
- IBMR $0.05
- BSMZ Oct 19, 2026
- IBMR Oct 1, 2026
- BSMZ Oct 23, 2026
- IBMR Oct 6, 2026
- BSMZ Monthly
- IBMR Monthly
Distribution history
BSMZ vs IBMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMZ 7.8%IBMR 4.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMZ −0.33IBMR 0.02
- Worst fall
- BSMZ −8.5%IBMR −4.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BSMZ 0.19IBMR 0.75
BSMZ and IBMR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

