Skip to content

BUFC vs GDEC

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December

GDECCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

BUFC −0.16pt a year

BUFC0.69%GDEC0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFC 1.2×the volume

BUFC49.5KGDEC41K

BUFC vs GDEC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.8%BUFC+10.2%GDEC

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BUFC +5.8%. GDEC +10.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%, better
GDEC 0.85%
Fund size
BUFC $1.11B
GDEC $426M
1Y total return
BUFC +5.8%
GDEC +10.2%, better
Holdings
BUFC 4
GDEC 3
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 49.5K sh, better
GDEC 41K sh
NAV per share
BUFC $43.25
GDEC $40.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. GDEC: Cost 13, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 86, Holdings 58, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, GDEC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCGDEC
Cost30% weightB57HigherF13
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC41C42Higher
Tradability15% weightB62A86Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB58
Durability5% weightA74HigherB69

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and GDEC are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

BUFC ranks 4th and GDEC 25th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4CPOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 20CXOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 43
  7. Rank 25CGDECFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 42
  8. Rank 25CGJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JulyScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

GDECCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

GDEC The December door into First Trust's moderate-buffer lineup: 15% of downside on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust absorbed over a one-year outcome period, in exchange for an upside cap reset each December.

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

GDEC The Fund seeks returns matching the price return of the stated S&P 500 ETF, subject to a 12.08% upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the specified outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • GDEC Absorbs the first 15% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each outcome period, the middle setting between shallow and deep buffers.
  • The clock resets every December, and sibling funds run the same design in other months, so a ladder can be built without picking one start date.
  • The reference asset is plain large-cap US equity, not a niche index. All the shaping happens in the options overlay wrapped around it.

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.
  • GDEC Fees run 0.85% a year against a 0.79% median for buffer peers, and the laddered BUFF charges 0.10%. Cost is the main gap in this group.
  • Upside stops at a cap set fresh each December, and the fund follows price return, so S&P 500 dividends stay outside the deal.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's largest buffer funds, which puts more weight on limit orders and avoiding the open and close.

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full GDEC profile⁠

BUFC vs GDEC Holdings

How BUFC and GDEC differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BUFC and 0.0% of GDEC.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in BUFC and GDEC, widest gap first
SectorMore in BUFCMore in GDEC
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BUFC and GDEC, widest gap first
CountryMore in BUFCMore in GDEC
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BUFC100.3%
  • GDEC102.2%

Securities held

  • BUFC3
  • GDEC2

Asset class

BUFC
Alternatives
GDEC
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in BUFC3
  • In both0
  • Only in GDEC2

Only in BUFC

3 securities, 100% of BUFC by weight

  • 4SPY 11/30/26 C3.86 4SPY 11/30/26 C3.8698.06%
  • 4SPY 11/30/26 P772.49 4SPY 11/30/26 P772.491.75%
  • Alliancebernstein Govt Stif Ssc Fund 64BA Agis 5870.53%

Only in GDEC

2 securities, 100% of GDEC by weight

  • 2026-12-18 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 6.83101.34%
  • 2026-12-18 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 680.610.50%

Weight gaps

BUFC and GDEC share no securities.

All 7 BUFC holdings⁠All 4 GDEC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs GDEC Cost

Overpaying GDEC vs BUFC

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • GDEC 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • GDEC 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GDEC $16,199BUFC $13,429

Year by year

YearBUFCGDECOverpaying
10$1,232$1,508$276
20$4,697$5,706$1,009
30$13,429$16,199$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
  • 0.85%GDEC
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

GDEC 37th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs GDEC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
GDEC None

Distribution history

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GDECAll GDEC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFC vs GDEC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024GDEC 5.2%since Jan 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024GDEC 1.22since Jan 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023GDEC −10.6%since Dec 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26GDEC 0.42

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GDECCvsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GDECCvsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GDECCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.