Skip to content

GDEC vs PSMJ

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December

GDECCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.36pt a year

GDEC0.85%PSMJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GDEC 6.2×the volume

GDEC41KPSMJ6.64K

GDEC vs PSMJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.2%GDEC+8.2%PSMJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GDEC +10.2%. PSMJ +8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GDEC 0.85%
PSMJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
GDEC $426M
PSMJ $108M
1Y total return
GDEC +10.2%, better
PSMJ +8.2%
Yield (12M)
GDEC No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Holdings
GDEC 3
PSMJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
GDEC 41K sh, better
PSMJ 6.64K sh
NAV per share
GDEC $40.88
PSMJ $34.43
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GDEC: Cost 13, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 86, Holdings 58, Durability 69. PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for GDEC, PSMJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGDECPSMJ
Cost30% weightF13A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC42C46Higher
Tradability15% weightA86HigherC50
Holdings10% weightB58Not scored
Durability5% weightB69HigherB63

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GDEC and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and GDEC 25th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 20CXOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 43
  5. Rank 25CGDECFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 42
  6. Rank 25CGJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JulyScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GDECCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

In short

GDEC The December door into First Trust's moderate-buffer lineup: 15% of downside on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust absorbed over a one-year outcome period, in exchange for an upside cap reset each December.

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

Stated mandate

GDEC The Fund seeks returns matching the price return of the stated S&P 500 ETF, subject to a 12.08% upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the specified outcome period.

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • GDEC Absorbs the first 15% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each outcome period, the middle setting between shallow and deep buffers.
  • The clock resets every December, and sibling funds run the same design in other months, so a ladder can be built without picking one start date.
  • The reference asset is plain large-cap US equity, not a niche index. All the shaping happens in the options overlay wrapped around it.
  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • GDEC Fees run 0.85% a year against a 0.79% median for buffer peers, and the laddered BUFF charges 0.10%. Cost is the main gap in this group.
  • Upside stops at a cap set fresh each December, and the fund follows price return, so S&P 500 dividends stay outside the deal.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's largest buffer funds, which puts more weight on limit orders and avoiding the open and close.
  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com

Full GDEC profile⁠

Full PSMJ profile⁠

GDEC vs PSMJ Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GDEC vs PSMJ Cost

Overpaying GDEC vs PSMJ

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GDEC 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GDEC 0.85%
  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GDEC $16,199PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearGDECPSMJOverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%GDEC
  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

GDEC 37th cheapest of 51 funds

GDEC vs PSMJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GDEC No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Payout (12M)
GDEC None
PSMJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2021, same scale for both

GDECAll GDEC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.00252021

GDEC vs PSMJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GDEC 5.2%since Jan 2024PSMJ 6.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GDEC 1.22since Jan 2024PSMJ 1.47
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GDEC −10.6%since Dec 2023PSMJ −10.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GDEC 0.42PSMJ 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • GDECCvsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GDECCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GDECCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.