BUFC ranks 4th and PJAN 10th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs PJAN
BUFC −0.10pt a year
0.69%0.79%
PJAN 1.1×the volume
49.5K52.8K
BUFC vs PJAN Performance
+5.8%+10.1%
- BUFC 0.69%, better
- PJAN 0.79%
- BUFC $1.11B
- PJAN $1.41B
- BUFC +5.8%
- PJAN +10.1%, better
- BUFC 4
- PJAN 3
- BUFC 49.5K sh
- PJAN 52.8K sh, better
- BUFC $43.25
- PJAN $50.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | PJAN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74 | A88Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and PJAN are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
PJANC
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
PJAN The January edition of Innovator's 15% Power Buffer series: it absorbs the first 15% of an S&P 500 price drop over the year in exchange for a capped upside, then resets every January 1. One of the originals, running since 2019.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
PJAN The fund uses a defined-outcome strategy tied to SPY, seeking to track its return up to a cap while protecting the first 15% of losses during the annual outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs PJAN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs PJAN Cost
Overpaying PJAN vs BUFC
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
PJAN 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | PJAN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,405 | $173 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,331 | $634 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $15,174 | $1,745 |
- 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
- 0.79%PJAN
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
PJAN 24th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs PJAN Dividends
- BUFC None
- PJAN None
Distribution history
BUFC vs PJAN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%PJAN 6.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82PJAN 1.45
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%PJAN −11.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26PJAN 0.50
BUFC and PJAN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
