Skip to content

BUFC vs PJAN

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PJANCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BUFC −0.10pt a year

BUFC0.69%PJAN0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

PJAN 1.1×the volume

BUFC49.5KPJAN52.8K

BUFC vs PJAN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.8%BUFC+10.1%PJAN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BUFC +5.8%. PJAN +10.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%, better
PJAN 0.79%
Fund size
BUFC $1.11B
PJAN $1.41B
1Y total return
BUFC +5.8%
PJAN +10.1%, better
Holdings
BUFC 4
PJAN 3
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 49.5K sh
PJAN 52.8K sh, better
NAV per share
BUFC $43.25
PJAN $50.78
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. PJAN: Cost 35, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings not scored, Durability 88.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, PJAN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCPJAN
Cost30% weightB57HigherD35
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC41C52Higher
Tradability15% weightB62A72Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA74A88Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and PJAN are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

BUFC ranks 4th and PJAN 10th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4CPOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 8CPNOVInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 52
  7. Rank 10CPJANInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 51
  8. Rank 11CPAPRInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

PJANCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

PJAN The January edition of Innovator's 15% Power Buffer series: it absorbs the first 15% of an S&P 500 price drop over the year in exchange for a capped upside, then resets every January 1. One of the originals, running since 2019.

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

PJAN The fund uses a defined-outcome strategy tied to SPY, seeking to track its return up to a cap while protecting the first 15% of losses during the annual outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • PJAN Launched January 2019, one of the first calendar-year buffer ETFs, and now among the larger funds in the buffer space with many reset cycles behind it.innovatoretfs.com
  • The mechanic is simple: the first 15% of SPY's price decline over the outcome period is absorbed, upside runs to a cap set at the start of each January, then it all resets.sec.gov
  • The 0.79% fee sits right at the median for buffer funds, and this is one of the stronger implementations in a crowded 15%-buffer peer group.
  • Moderately traded with a full twelve-month sibling lineup behind it, so the January vintage is a deliberate pick rather than the only door in.

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.
  • PJAN The buffer and cap are designed for investors who hold from the start of the outcome period to its end. Buy mid-period and your effective cushion and remaining upside differ.sec.gov
  • It follows SPY's price return only. The fund does not receive the underlying ETF's dividends, and it is not built as an income vehicle.sec.gov
  • One start date, one calendar. Siblings like PAPR, PJUL and POCT run the same 15% buffer off other months, and BUFF ladders across the year.

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full PJAN profile⁠

BUFC vs PJAN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs PJAN Cost

Overpaying PJAN vs BUFC

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PJAN 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • PJAN 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PJAN $15,174BUFC $13,429

Year by year

YearBUFCPJANOverpaying
10$1,232$1,405$173
20$4,697$5,331$634
30$13,429$15,174$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
  • 0.79%PJAN
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

PJAN 24th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs PJAN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
PJAN None

Distribution history

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PJANAll PJAN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFC vs PJAN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024PJAN 6.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024PJAN 1.45
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023PJAN −11.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26PJAN 0.50

BUFC and PJAN in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJANCvsPSMOB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJANCvsPSMJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJANCvsPSMRB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.