Skip to content

BUFC vs PMAY

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May

PMAYCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BUFC −0.10pt a year

BUFC0.69%PMAY0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFC 1.5×the volume

BUFC49.5KPMAY32.9K

BUFC vs PMAY Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.8%BUFC+8.1%PMAY

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BUFC +5.8%. PMAY +8.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%0%2%4%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%, better
PMAY 0.79%
Fund size
BUFC $1.11B
PMAY $781M
1Y total return
BUFC +5.8%
PMAY +8.1%, better
Holdings
BUFC 4
PMAY 3
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 49.5K sh, better
PMAY 32.9K sh
NAV per share
BUFC $43.25
PMAY $42.17
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. PMAY: Cost 35, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings not scored, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, PMAY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCPMAY
Cost30% weightB57HigherD35
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC41B64Higher
Tradability15% weightB62HigherC51
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA74A76Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and PMAY are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

BUFC ranks 4th and PMAY 14th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4CPOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 14CLOCTInnovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETFScore 48
  7. Rank 14CPMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MayScore 48
  8. Rank 16CPDECInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

PMAYCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

PMAY A 15% cushion on the S&P 500, rebooted every May. PMAY gives up part of the upside (a cap reset each period) in exchange for absorbing the index's first 15 points of losses, and it can be held through reset after reset.

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

PMAY The fund seeks to participate in SPY's gains up to a preset cap while protecting the first 15% of SPY losses during each roughly annual outcome period. It resets for a new outcome period and may be held indefinitely.

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • PMAY The buffer is the whole point: the first 15% of S&P 500 losses over each roughly one-year period are absorbed before fees, then the structure resets for a new period.
  • You know the calendar in advance. Each outcome period runs from May 1 to the end of the following April, so the reset date is never a surprise.
  • Easy to get in and out of by buffer-fund standards: trading costs and market quality rate near the top of the S&P 500 buffer group.
  • Running since 2020 and one of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of S&P 500 buffer funds.

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.
  • PMAY The cap is the price of the cushion. Upside is limited each period, and a fresh cap is set at every reset, so it can land above or below the previous one.
  • Timing matters: buy mid-period and your effective cap and remaining buffer differ from the stated terms, which are designed to work over a full outcome period.
  • At 0.79%, it sits at the typical price for single-month buffer funds, while laddered alternatives like BUFP (0.50%) and PSFF (0.10%) charge less.

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full PMAY profile⁠

BUFC vs PMAY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs PMAY Cost

Overpaying PMAY vs BUFC

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PMAY 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • PMAY 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PMAY $15,174BUFC $13,429

Year by year

YearBUFCPMAYOverpaying
10$1,232$1,405$173
20$4,697$5,331$634
30$13,429$15,174$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
  • 0.79%PMAY
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

PMAY 24th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs PMAY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
PMAY None

Distribution history

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PMAYAll PMAY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFC vs PMAY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024PMAY 4.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024PMAY 1.92
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023PMAY −13.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26PMAY 0.31

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PMAYCvsPSMOB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PMAYCvsPSMJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PMAYCvsPSMRB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.