BUFC ranks 4th and PMAY 14th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs PMAY
BUFC −0.10pt a year
0.69%0.79%
BUFC 1.5×the volume
49.5K32.9K
BUFC vs PMAY Performance
+5.8%+8.1%
- BUFC 0.69%, better
- PMAY 0.79%
- BUFC $1.11B
- PMAY $781M
- BUFC +5.8%
- PMAY +8.1%, better
- BUFC 4
- PMAY 3
- BUFC 49.5K sh, better
- PMAY 32.9K sh
- BUFC $43.25
- PMAY $42.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | PMAY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74 | A76Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and PMAY are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
PMAYC
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
PMAY A 15% cushion on the S&P 500, rebooted every May. PMAY gives up part of the upside (a cap reset each period) in exchange for absorbing the index's first 15 points of losses, and it can be held through reset after reset.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
PMAY The fund seeks to participate in SPY's gains up to a preset cap while protecting the first 15% of SPY losses during each roughly annual outcome period. It resets for a new outcome period and may be held indefinitely.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs PMAY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs PMAY Cost
Overpaying PMAY vs BUFC
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
PMAY 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | PMAY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,405 | $173 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,331 | $634 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $15,174 | $1,745 |
- 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
- 0.79%PMAY
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
PMAY 24th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs PMAY Dividends
- BUFC None
- PMAY None
Distribution history
BUFC vs PMAY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%PMAY 4.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82PMAY 1.92
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%PMAY −13.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26PMAY 0.31
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.