FLCH ranks 2nd and CAS 24th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CAS vs FLCH
FLCH −0.75pt a year
0.94%0.19%
FLCH 35.1×the volume
3.09K108K
CAS vs FLCH Performance
−6.2%−20.9%
- CAS 0.94%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- CAS $10M
- FLCH $252M
- CAS −6.2%, better
- FLCH −20.9%
- CAS 78.48%, better
- FLCH 2.63%
- CAS 23
- FLCH 1112
- CAS 3.09K sh
- FLCH 108K sh, better
- CAS $19.29
- FLCH $19.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAS | FLCH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A83 | A87Higher |
| Risk | B65Higher | B64 |
| Tradability | F18 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | F0 | B65Higher |
| Durability | D34 | A70Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CAS and FLCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CASD
FLCHA
In short
CAS Simplify's swing at China: an actively run book of mainland A shares, roughly 40 names deep, chasing capital appreciation and income at the same time instead of tracking a broad China index.
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
Stated mandate
CAS The Fund seeks capital appreciation and income. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of assets in China A Shares or instruments with substantially similar economic characteristics.
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CAS vs FLCH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAS vs FLCH Cost
Overpaying CAS vs FLCH
$13,752
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAS 0.94%
$17,704
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAS | FLCH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,661 | $347 | $1,314 |
| 20 | $6,260 | $1,351 | $4,909 |
| 30 | $17,704 | $3,952 | $13,752 |
- 0.94%CAS
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
CAS 27th cheapest of 28 funds
CAS vs FLCH Dividends
- CAS 78.48%, better
- FLCH 2.63%
- CAS $15.25
- FLCH $0.51
- CAS $1.00
- FLCH $0.14
- CAS Oct 27, 2026
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- CAS Oct 30, 2026
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- CAS Monthly
- FLCH Twice a year
Distribution history
CAS vs FLCH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CAS 25.1%FLCH 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CAS 0.63FLCH 0.29
- Worst fall
- CAS −24.0%FLCH −48.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CAS 1.09FLCH 0.55
Popular comparisons
- 0.94% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.