Skip to content

CAS vs FLCH

Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF

CASDNYSE Arca

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLCHANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FLCH −0.75pt a year

CAS0.94%FLCH0.19%

Avg volume · 30D

FLCH 35.1×the volume

CAS3.09KFLCH108K

CAS vs FLCH Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−6.2%CAS−20.9%FLCH

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CAS −6.2%. FLCH −20.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CAS 0.94%
FLCH 0.19%, better
Fund size
CAS $10M
FLCH $252M
1Y total return
CAS −6.2%, better
FLCH −20.9%
Yield (12M)
CAS 78.48%, better
FLCH 2.63%
Holdings
CAS 23
FLCH 1112
Avg volume (30D)
CAS 3.09K sh
FLCH 108K sh, better
NAV per share
CAS $19.29
FLCH $19.38
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CAS: Cost 3, Risk 65, Mission 83, Tradability 18, Holdings 0, Durability 34. FLCH: Cost 100, Risk 64, Mission 87, Tradability 62, Holdings 65, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for CAS, FLCH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCASFLCH
Cost30% weightF3A100Higher
Mission25% weightA83A87Higher
Risk15% weightB65HigherB64
Tradability15% weightF18B62Higher
Holdings10% weightF0B65Higher
Durability5% weightD34A70Higher

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CAS and FLCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

FLCH ranks 2nd and CAS 24th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 23DMCHSMatthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHSScore 39
  5. Rank 24DCASSimplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETFScore 35
  6. Rank 24DCGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETFScore 35

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CASDSimplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF

FLCHAFranklin FTSE China ETF

In short

CAS Simplify's swing at China: an actively run book of mainland A shares, roughly 40 names deep, chasing capital appreciation and income at the same time instead of tracking a broad China index.

FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.

Stated mandate

CAS The Fund seeks capital appreciation and income. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of assets in China A Shares or instruments with substantially similar economic characteristics.

FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.

Why people hold it

  • CAS Unusual mandate: normally at least 80% of assets in China A shares or instruments with substantially similar economics, picked actively rather than tracked from an index.
  • Concentrated on purpose, roughly 40 positions, and it pursues income alongside price appreciation rather than share-price return alone.
  • Stays in the lane its prospectus describes: mainland China equity exposure, actively managed, no style drift into a generic global basket.
  • FLCH 0.19% a year, against a roughly 0.70% median for China funds. It also undercuts the category stalwarts MCHI and GXC, both at 0.59%.
  • About 1,000 holdings, so you own the long tail of Chinese listings rather than a short list of mega-cap headline names.
  • One job, done tightly: mirror the FTSE China RIC Capped Index before fees. On tracking it ranks among the strongest builds in its China peer group.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • CAS The active tilt costs money: 0.88% a year sits above the typical China fund, while index rivals like JCHI (0.15%) and FLCH (0.19%) charge a fraction of it.
  • Launched in 2025 and still small and lightly traded, which generally means wider bid-ask spreads than the household-name China ETFs.
  • Income here is an objective, not a calendar: payouts have come irregularly rather than on a fixed monthly or quarterly schedule.
  • FLCH It is China or nothing. Policy shifts, regulatory news and the currency drive the ride, with no other market in the basket to cushion it.
  • Mid-sized and only moderately traded next to the category's giants, so bid-ask spreads can bite more on larger orders.
  • Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly. This is an equity index vehicle, not an income schedule.

Full CAS profile⁠

Full FLCH profile⁠

CAS vs FLCH Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CAS vs FLCH Cost

Overpaying CAS vs FLCH

$13,752

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CAS 0.94%

    $17,704

  • FLCH 0.19%

    $3,952

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CAS 0.94%
  • FLCH 0.19%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530CAS $17,704FLCH $3,952

Year by year

YearCASFLCHOverpaying
10$1,661$347$1,314
20$6,260$1,351$4,909
30$17,704$3,952$13,752

Expense ratio

  • 0.94%CAS
  • 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

FLCH cheapest of 28 funds

CAS 27th cheapest of 28 funds

CAS vs FLCH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CAS 78.48%, better
FLCH 2.63%
Payout (12M)
CAS $15.25
FLCH $0.51
Last payment
CAS $1.00
FLCH $0.14
Ex-dividend
CAS Oct 27, 2026
FLCH Jun 26, 2026
Paid on
CAS Oct 30, 2026
FLCH Jul 6, 2026
Frequency
CAS Monthly
FLCH Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CASMonthly · 14 paymentsAll CAS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 25, 2025 $0.24; Sep 25, 2025 $0.50; Nov 21, 2025 $1.00; Dec 23, 2025 $10.50; Jan 27, 2026 $0.20; Feb 24, 2026 $0.15; Mar 26, 2026 $0.10; Apr 27, 2026 $0.10; May 26, 2026 $0.10; Jun 25, 2026 $0.10; Jul 28, 2026 $0.50; Aug 26, 2026 $0.50; Sep 25, 2026 $1.00; Oct 27, 2026 $1.00. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1020232026YTD
FLCHTwice a year · 7 paymentsAll FLCH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2023 $0.19; Dec 15, 2023 $0.37; Jun 21, 2024 $0.12; Dec 20, 2024 $0.41; Jun 20, 2025 $0.19; Dec 19, 2025 $0.37; Jun 26, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1020232026YTD

CAS vs FLCH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CAS 25.1%since Feb 2025FLCH 21.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CAS 0.63since Feb 2025FLCH 0.29
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CAS −24.0%since Jan 2025FLCH −48.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CAS 1.09FLCH 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • CASDvsCXSEA

    Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.94% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsCXSEA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CASDvsMCHIA

    Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.94% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsMCHIA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CASDvsGXCA

    Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.94% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsGXCA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.