CXSE ranks 1st and CAS 24th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CAS vs CXSE
CXSE −0.62pt a year
0.94%0.32%
CXSE 12.1×the volume
3.09K37.2K
CAS vs CXSE Performance
−6.2%−24.9%
- CAS 0.94%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- CAS $10M
- CXSE $372M
- CAS −6.2%, better
- CXSE −24.9%
- CAS 78.48%, better
- CXSE 2.22%
- CAS 23
- CXSE 241
- CAS 3.09K sh
- CXSE 37.2K sh, better
- CAS $19.29
- CXSE $31.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAS | CXSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A83 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B65Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | F18 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | F0 | A74Higher |
| Durability | D34 | A79Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CAS and CXSE are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CASD
CXSEA
In short
CAS Simplify's swing at China: an actively run book of mainland A shares, roughly 40 names deep, chasing capital appreciation and income at the same time instead of tracking a broad China index.
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
Stated mandate
CAS The Fund seeks capital appreciation and income. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of assets in China A Shares or instruments with substantially similar economic characteristics.
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CAS vs CXSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAS vs CXSE Cost
Overpaying CAS vs CXSE
$11,162
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAS 0.94%
$17,704
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAS | CXSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,661 | $580 | $1,081 |
| 20 | $6,260 | $2,250 | $4,010 |
| 30 | $17,704 | $6,542 | $11,162 |
- 0.94%CAS
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
CAS 27th cheapest of 28 funds
CAS vs CXSE Dividends
- CAS 78.48%, better
- CXSE 2.22%
- CAS $15.25
- CXSE $0.69
- CAS $1.00
- CXSE $0.26
- CAS Oct 27, 2026
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- CAS Oct 30, 2026
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- CAS Monthly
- CXSE Quarterly
Distribution history
CAS vs CXSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CAS 25.1%CXSE 24.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CAS 0.63CXSE 0.12
- Worst fall
- CAS −24.0%CXSE −57.6%
- Market sensitivity
- CAS 1.09CXSE 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.94% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.