MCHI ranks 3rd and CAS 24th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CAS vs MCHI
MCHI −0.35pt a year
0.94%0.59%
MCHI 724.8×the volume
3.09K2.24M
CAS vs MCHI Performance
−6.2%−21.3%
- CAS 0.94%
- MCHI 0.59%, better
- CAS $10M
- MCHI $5.49B
- CAS −6.2%, better
- MCHI −21.3%
- CAS 78.48%, better
- MCHI 2.23%
- CAS 23
- MCHI 581
- CAS 3.09K sh
- MCHI 2.24M sh, better
- CAS $19.29
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAS | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A83 | A87Higher |
| Risk | B65Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | F18 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | F0 | B58Higher |
| Durability | D34 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CAS and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CASD
MCHIA
In short
CAS Simplify's swing at China: an actively run book of mainland A shares, roughly 40 names deep, chasing capital appreciation and income at the same time instead of tracking a broad China index.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
CAS The Fund seeks capital appreciation and income. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of assets in China A Shares or instruments with substantially similar economic characteristics.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CAS vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAS vs MCHI Cost
Overpaying CAS vs MCHI
$6,069
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAS 0.94%
$17,704
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAS | MCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,661 | $1,058 | $603 |
| 20 | $6,260 | $4,051 | $2,209 |
| 30 | $17,704 | $11,635 | $6,069 |
- 0.94%CAS
- 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
CAS 27th cheapest of 28 funds
CAS vs MCHI Dividends
- CAS 78.48%, better
- MCHI 2.23%
- CAS $15.25
- MCHI $1.10
- CAS $1.00
- MCHI $0.36
- CAS Oct 27, 2026
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- CAS Oct 30, 2026
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- CAS Monthly
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
CAS vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CAS 25.1%MCHI 21.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CAS 0.63MCHI 0.26
- Worst fall
- CAS −24.0%MCHI −49.2%
- Market sensitivity
- CAS 1.09MCHI 0.63
CAS and MCHI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.94% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





