GNR ranks 2nd and CCNR 5th of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.
CCNR vs GNR
CCNR −0.01pt a year
0.39%0.40%
GNR 11.7×the volume
29K341K
CCNR vs GNR Performance
+24.5%+31.9%
- CCNR 0.39%, better
- GNR 0.40%
- CCNR $437M
- GNR $5.39B
- CCNR +24.5%
- GNR +31.9%, better
- CCNR 2.99%, better
- GNR 2.42%
- CCNR 313
- GNR 110
- CCNR 29K sh
- GNR 341K sh, better
- CCNR $38.27
- GNR $75.69
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CCNR | GNR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80 | A80 |
| Mission | B61 | A76Higher |
| Risk | C45 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | A91Higher | A77 |
| Durability | D39 | A89Higher |
Rank among Natural Resources funds
Same Category. CCNR and GNR are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CCNRB
GNRA
In short
CCNR A commodity house's version of a resource stock fund: CCNR spreads across roughly 300 owners, explorers, developers and suppliers, with the Bloomberg Commodity Index as its stated reference point.
GNR Most resource ETFs are energy funds in a hard hat. GNR spreads a global, large-cap lineup across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining, roughly 90 names tracking an S&P natural resources index since 2010.
Stated mandate
CCNR The fund seeks to maximize real returns through prudent investment management and invests in equity securities of natural-resource owners, explorers, developers, and related suppliers.
GNR The fund seeks to provide investment results corresponding generally to the total return performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It provides exposure to large-cap companies across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CCNR vs GNR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CCNR vs GNR Cost
Overpaying GNR vs CCNR
$192
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CCNR 0.39%
$7,898
GNR 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CCNR | GNR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $723 | $18 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $2,793 | $68 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $8,090 | $192 |
- 0.39%CCNR, cheaper
- 0.40%GNR
- Middle half of Natural Resources funds
- Median 0.46%
CCNR 3rd cheapest of 14 funds
GNR 4th cheapest of 14 funds
CCNR vs GNR Dividends
- CCNR 2.99%, better
- GNR 2.42%
- CCNR $1.14
- GNR $1.82
- CCNR $1.14
- GNR $0.86
- CCNR Dec 8, 2025
- GNR Jun 1, 2026
- CCNR Dec 9, 2025
- GNR Jun 3, 2026
- CCNR Irregular
- GNR Twice a year
Distribution history
CCNR vs GNR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CCNR 18.3%GNR 15.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CCNR 0.96GNR 0.75
- Worst fall
- CCNR −20.1%GNR −25.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CCNR 0.46GNR 0.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.