NANR ranks 2nd and CCNR 5th of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.
CCNR vs NANR
NANR −0.04pt a year
0.39%0.35%
CCNR 1.02×the volume
29K28.5K
CCNR vs NANR Performance
+24.5%+40.2%
- CCNR 0.39%
- NANR 0.35%, better
- CCNR $437M
- NANR $840M
- CCNR +24.5%
- NANR +40.2%, better
- CCNR 2.99%, better
- NANR 1.63%
- CCNR 313
- NANR 204
- CCNR 29K sh, better
- NANR 28.5K sh
- CCNR $38.27
- NANR $87.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CCNR | NANR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80 | A99Higher |
| Mission | B61 | A72Higher |
| Risk | C45 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A91Higher | C53 |
| Durability | D39 | A81Higher |
Rank among Natural Resources funds
Same Category. CCNR and NANR are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CCNRB
NANRA
In short
CCNR A commodity house's version of a resource stock fund: CCNR spreads across roughly 300 owners, explorers, developers and suppliers, with the Bloomberg Commodity Index as its stated reference point.
NANR Natural resources without the passport: roughly 200 large and mid cap US and Canadian energy, mining and agriculture names in one basket, for 0.35% a year.
Stated mandate
CCNR The fund seeks to maximize real returns through prudent investment management and invests in equity securities of natural-resource owners, explorers, developers, and related suppliers.
NANR The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. It targets large- and mid-cap publicly traded U.S. and Canadian companies in energy, metals and mining, and agriculture-related natural-resources businesses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CCNR vs NANR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CCNR vs NANR Cost
Overpaying CCNR vs NANR
$772
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CCNR 0.39%
$7,898
NANR 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CCNR | NANR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $634 | $71 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $2,454 | $271 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $7,126 | $772 |
- 0.39%CCNR
- 0.35%NANR, cheaper
- Middle half of Natural Resources funds
- Median 0.46%
NANR cheapest of 14 funds
CCNR 3rd cheapest of 14 funds
CCNR vs NANR Dividends
- CCNR 2.99%, better
- NANR 1.63%
- CCNR $1.14
- NANR $1.41
- CCNR $1.14
- NANR $0.71
- CCNR Dec 8, 2025
- NANR Jun 1, 2026
- CCNR Dec 9, 2025
- NANR Jun 3, 2026
- CCNR Irregular
- NANR Twice a year
Distribution history
CCNR vs NANR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CCNR 18.3%NANR 19.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CCNR 0.96NANR 0.95
- Worst fall
- CCNR −20.1%NANR −26.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CCNR 0.46NANR 0.49
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.