HAP ranks 4th and CCNR 5th of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.
CCNR vs HAP
CCNR −0.02pt a year
0.39%0.41%
CCNR 1.04×the volume
29K27.9K
CCNR vs HAP Performance
+24.5%+32.5%
- CCNR 0.39%, better
- HAP 0.41%
- CCNR $437M
- HAP $326M
- CCNR +24.5%
- HAP +32.5%, better
- CCNR 2.99%, better
- HAP 1.84%
- CCNR 313
- HAP 130
- CCNR 29K sh, better
- HAP 27.9K sh
- CCNR $38.27
- HAP $74.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CCNR | HAP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | B68 |
| Mission | B61 | |
| Risk | C45 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | A91Higher | A73 |
| Durability | D39 | B60Higher |
Rank among Natural Resources funds
Same Category. CCNR and HAP are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CCNRB
HAPA
In short
CCNR A commodity house's version of a resource stock fund: CCNR spreads across roughly 300 owners, explorers, developers and suppliers, with the Bloomberg Commodity Index as its stated reference point.
HAP Metals, energy and farm goods in one global basket. HAP has held hard-asset producers since 2008, spreading across roughly 150 companies worldwide rather than betting on one commodity or one continent.
Stated mandate
CCNR The fund seeks to maximize real returns through prudent investment management and invests in equity securities of natural-resource owners, explorers, developers, and related suppliers.
HAP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Market Vector Global Natural Resources Index, which covers global natural-resources companies involved in metals, energy sources, and agricultural products.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CCNR vs HAP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CCNR vs HAP Cost
Overpaying HAP vs CCNR
$383
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CCNR 0.39%
$7,898
HAP 0.41%
$8,281
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CCNR | HAP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $741 | $36 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $2,860 | $135 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $8,281 | $383 |
- 0.39%CCNR, cheaper
- 0.41%HAP
- Middle half of Natural Resources funds
- Median 0.46%
CCNR 3rd cheapest of 14 funds
HAP 5th cheapest of 14 funds
CCNR vs HAP Dividends
- CCNR 2.99%, better
- HAP 1.84%
- CCNR $1.14
- HAP $1.36
- CCNR $1.14
- HAP $1.36
- CCNR Dec 8, 2025
- HAP Dec 22, 2025
- CCNR Dec 9, 2025
- HAP Dec 26, 2025
- CCNR Irregular
- HAP Annual
Distribution history
CCNR vs HAP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CCNR 18.3%HAP 15.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CCNR 0.96HAP 0.98
- Worst fall
- CCNR −20.1%HAP −25.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CCNR 0.46HAP 0.59
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.