Skip to content

CCOM vs CMDT

Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF

CCOMFNYSE Arca

PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

CMDTBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

CMDT −0.34pt a year

CCOM0.99%CMDT0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

CMDT 416.9×the volume

CCOM158CMDT65.9K

CCOM vs CMDT Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.9%CCOM+7.3%CMDT

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CCOM +11.9%. CMDT +7.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CCOM 0.99%
CMDT 0.65%, better
Fund size
CCOM $111M
CMDT $890M
1Y total return
CCOM No data
CMDT +28.0%
Yield (12M)
CCOM No data
CMDT 12.09%
Holdings
CCOM 21
CMDT 357
Avg volume (30D)
CCOM 158 sh
CMDT 65.9K sh, better
NAV per share
CCOM $26.26
CMDT $31.84
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CCOM: Cost 8, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 4, Holdings not scored, Durability 52. CMDT: Cost 61, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings 70, Durability 72.
Pillar letters and Scores for CCOM, CMDT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCCOMCMDT
Cost30% weightF8B61Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB60A81Higher
Tradability15% weightF4C51Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA70
Durability5% weightC52A72Higher

Rank among Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CCOM and CMDT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

CMDT ranks 4th and CCOM 12th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1APDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2BSOYBTeucrium Soybean FundScore 65
  3. Rank 2BWEATTeucrium Wheat FundScore 65
  4. Rank 4BCMDTPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded FundScore 64
  5. Rank 5BUSGUSCF Gold Strategy Plus Income FundScore 62
  6. Rank 11DKCCAKraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETFScore 29
  7. Rank 12FCCOMSimplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 22
  8. Rank 13FBDRYBreakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETFScore 17

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CCOMFSimplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF

CMDTBPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

In short

CCOM Chinese commodity futures are a market most US investors never see. CCOM trades them systematically, long and short, inside a 1940 Act fund that sends a 1099 instead of a K-1.

CMDT PIMCO took the standard commodity futures fund and added the thing it is known for: an actively managed bond portfolio sitting behind the commodity bets. The mandate is to beat the Bloomberg Commodity Index, not mirror it.

Stated mandate

CCOM The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through systematic investment in commodity futures traded on major Chinese exchanges. Its strategy uses systematic long/short models.

CMDT The fund aims to achieve a total return that outperforms the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while maintaining prudent investment management.

Why people hold it

  • CCOM Targets commodity futures on China's major exchanges, a pool of contracts priced by local supply and demand rather than the usual US benchmarks.
  • The models go long and short, so the fund can position for falling contracts as well as rising ones instead of riding one direction.
  • No Schedule K-1. It is built as a 1940 Act fund, so tax time brings a 1099 like any ordinary ETF.
  • Simplify already runs the broad-basket version (HARD); CCOM is the China-only slice for investors who want that exposure separated out.
  • CMDT Active by design. The stated objective is to outperform the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, not replicate it.
  • Two engines in one ticker: swaps, futures and commodity-linked notes for the commodity exposure, an actively managed fixed income portfolio as the collateral behind them.
  • A 1940 Act fund that routes commodity-linked exposure through a Cayman subsidiary, so holders get a 1099 rather than a partnership K-1.
  • Global commodity reach spread across roughly 300 positions, with cash distributed quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • CCOM The fee is 0.99% a year, above the typical charge among commodity futures funds. That is the toll for a strategy reaching markets few US managers access.
  • Launched in 2026 and lightly traded, so there is not much history to judge and spreads can run wider than in the big commodity ETFs.
  • Not a plain commodity tracker. The short book means results can move apart from a straight long basket of commodities, in either direction.
  • CMDT At 0.98% a year, it sits above cheaper index-based options in the commodity futures group such as PDBC (0.74%) and HARD (0.78%). Active management is what the premium buys.
  • Tracking is not the goal here. Manager calls can push results away from the Bloomberg Commodity Index in either direction.
  • The bond collateral sleeve brings interest rate and credit sensitivity that a plain futures-and-Treasuries commodity fund does not carry.

Full CCOM profile⁠

Full CMDT profile⁠

CCOM vs CMDT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CCOM vs CMDT Cost

Overpaying CCOM vs CMDT

$5,808

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CCOM 0.99%

    $18,525

  • CMDT 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CCOM 0.99%
  • CMDT 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530CCOM $18,525CMDT $12,717

Year by year

YearCCOMCMDTOverpaying
10$1,746$1,163$583
20$6,565$4,440$2,125
30$18,525$12,717$5,808

Expense ratio

  • 0.99%CCOM
  • 0.65%CMDT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.79%

CMDT 6th cheapest of 13 funds

CCOM 12th cheapest of 13 funds

CCOM vs CMDT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CCOM No data
CMDT 12.09%
Payout (12M)
CCOM No data
CMDT $3.83
Last payment
CCOM $0.10
CMDT $3.20
Ex-dividend
CCOM Sep 25, 2026
CMDT Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
CCOM Sep 30, 2026
CMDT Oct 5, 2026
Frequency
CCOM Quarterly
CMDT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CCOMQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll CCOM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD
CMDTQuarterly · 15 paymentsAll CMDT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jul 3, 2023 $0.03; Oct 2, 2023 $0.32; Dec 11, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.31; Apr 1, 2024 $0.27; Jul 1, 2024 $0.26; Oct 1, 2024 $0.76; Dec 31, 2024 $0.93; Apr 1, 2025 $0.20; Jul 1, 2025 $0.21; Oct 1, 2025 $0.21; Dec 31, 2025 $0.22; Apr 1, 2026 $0.19; Jul 1, 2026 $0.22; Oct 1, 2026 $3.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD

CCOM vs CMDT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CCOM No dataCMDT 11.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CCOM No dataCMDT 0.83
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CCOM No dataCMDT −13.2%since May 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CCOM −0.02CMDT 0.78

Popular comparisons

  • CCOMFvsPDBCA

    Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsPDBCA

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CCOMFvsSOYBB

    Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsSOYBB

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CCOMFvsWEATB

    Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsWEATB

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.