SOYB ranks 2nd and CCOM 12th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
CCOM vs SOYB
SOYB −0.36pt a year
0.99%0.63%
SOYB 436.3×the volume
15868.9K
CCOM vs SOYB Performance
+11.9%+3.9%
- CCOM 0.99%
- SOYB 0.63%, better
- CCOM $111M
- SOYB $39M
- CCOM
- SOYB +13.0%
- CCOM 21
- SOYB 12
- CCOM 158 sh
- SOYB 68.9K sh, better
- CCOM $26.26
- SOYB $26.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CCOM | SOYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F8 | B69Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B60Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | F4 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C52Higher | C49 |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. CCOM and SOYB are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CCOMF
SOYBB
In short
CCOM Chinese commodity futures are a market most US investors never see. CCOM trades them systematically, long and short, inside a 1940 Act fund that sends a 1099 instead of a K-1.
SOYB Soybeans, straight up. Since 2011 SOYB has tracked a benchmark of soybean futures for future delivery, wrapped so you can buy the bean in an ordinary brokerage account, and it charges less than the typical commodity futures fund.
Stated mandate
CCOM The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through systematic investment in commodity futures traded on major Chinese exchanges. Its strategy uses systematic long/short models.
SOYB SOYB seeks to track daily changes in the soybean market for future delivery through its benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CCOM vs SOYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CCOM vs SOYB Cost
Overpaying CCOM vs SOYB
$6,166
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CCOM 0.99%
$18,525
SOYB 0.63%
$12,359
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CCOM | SOYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,128 | $618 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $4,311 | $2,254 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $12,359 | $6,166 |
- 0.99%CCOM
- 0.63%SOYB, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
SOYB 5th cheapest of 13 funds
CCOM 12th cheapest of 13 funds
CCOM vs SOYB Dividends
- CCOM
- SOYB None
- CCOM $0.10
- SOYB
- CCOM Sep 25, 2026
- SOYB
- CCOM Sep 30, 2026
- SOYB
- CCOM Quarterly
- SOYB
Distribution history
CCOM vs SOYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CCOM SOYB 15.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CCOM SOYB −0.33
- Worst fall
- CCOM SOYB −31.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CCOM −0.02SOYB 0.44
CCOM and SOYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


