WEAT ranks 2nd and CCOM 12th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
CCOM vs WEAT
WEAT −0.37pt a year
0.99%0.62%
WEAT 3404.3×the volume
158538K
CCOM vs WEAT Performance
+11.9%−6.8%
- CCOM 0.99%
- WEAT 0.62%, better
- CCOM $111M
- WEAT $234M
- CCOM
- WEAT +4.7%
- CCOM 21
- WEAT 31
- CCOM 158 sh
- WEAT 538K sh, better
- CCOM $26.26
- WEAT $22.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CCOM | WEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F8 | A76Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B60Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | F4 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C52 | B61Higher |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. CCOM and WEAT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CCOMF
WEATB
In short
CCOM Chinese commodity futures are a market most US investors never see. CCOM trades them systematically, long and short, inside a 1940 Act fund that sends a 1099 instead of a K-1.
WEAT Wheat, straight up. Since 2011 this Teucrium fund has given brokerage-account investors pure-play exposure to CBOT wheat futures, laddered across three contract months rather than piled into the front month.
Stated mandate
CCOM The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through systematic investment in commodity futures traded on major Chinese exchanges. Its strategy uses systematic long/short models.
WEAT The fund seeks cost-effective price exposure to the wheat market through futures for future delivery.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CCOM vs WEAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CCOM vs WEAT Cost
Overpaying CCOM vs WEAT
$6,346
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CCOM 0.99%
$18,525
WEAT 0.62%
$12,179
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CCOM | WEAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,111 | $635 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $4,246 | $2,319 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $12,179 | $6,346 |
- 0.99%CCOM
- 0.62%WEAT, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
WEAT 4th cheapest of 13 funds
CCOM 12th cheapest of 13 funds
CCOM vs WEAT Dividends
- CCOM
- WEAT None
- CCOM $0.10
- WEAT
- CCOM Sep 25, 2026
- WEAT
- CCOM Sep 30, 2026
- WEAT
- CCOM Quarterly
- WEAT
Distribution history
CCOM vs WEAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CCOM WEAT 22.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CCOM WEAT −0.46
- Worst fall
- CCOM WEAT −67.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CCOM −0.02WEAT 0.68
CCOM and WEAT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


